ArticleEpilepsia2026
Diagnostic yield and copy number variants findings in 219 adult patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy.
Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In a clinical setting, exome sequencing (ES) with copy number variant (CNV) analysis is currently the most effective approach for developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEE). However, trio-based ES is often not feasible in adults, its costs remain prohibitive in certain health care settings, and computational tools for CNV calling still lack sufficient accuracy. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) is indicated as a first-tier test for CNV detection in patients with DEE, dysmorphisms, and comorbidities. We investigate the role of CNVs in the etiology of DEE in an adult cohort, to define the most appropriate diagnostic approach in this population. A total of 219 patients (male/female: 104/115) with undiagnosed DEE underwent array-based comparative genomic hybridization/single nucleotide polymorphism arrays as adults. Causative CNVs were identified in 18 patients (8.2%); 14 were deletions (mean size ≈ 2.96 Mb), and four were duplications/triplications (mean size ≈ 3.63 Mb). Thirteen were responsible for known deletion/microduplication syndromes, and four were deletions involving haploinsufficient genes associated with epilepsy/neurodevelopmental disorders. For one deletion, population evidence, reports with overlapping deletions, and clinical databases support a likely pathogenic role. The mean age at CMA diagnosis was 32.4 ± 13 years. An additional 46 patients (21%) then received a molecular diagnosis through alternative approaches. Despite a diagnostic delay of 24.2 ± 14.5 years, CMA enabled a genetic diagnosis in 8.2% of our adult DEE patients, especially in those with dysmorphisms. The diagnostic yield rises to 10.4% when excluding patients diagnosed using other methods. A total of 66.7% of solved cases had direct implications from the diagnosis, supporting the clinical utility of CNV analysis inclusion in the diagnostic workflow for adult patients with DEE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.