Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400404›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Patient Perspectives on an Autonomous Wheelchair Transport Pilot in a Tertiary Medical Center: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Stephanie Decker Hurt, Jithinraj Edakkanambeth Varayil, Jon E Bowman, Karen M Fischer, Darrell R Schroeder, Ivana T Croghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie Decker HurtDivision of Support Services, Department of Facilities and Support Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jithinraj Edakkanambeth VarayilDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jon E BowmanDivision of Support Services, Department of Facilities and Support Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Karen M FischerDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Darrell R SchroederDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-5936
Ivana T CroghanDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3464-3525

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate patient satisfaction with the experience of using an autonomous wheelchair to transport patients in a large outpatient clinical environment.MethodsThe autonomous wheelchair pilot was approved as a feasibility pilot by the institutional committees and deemed a quality improvement project by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). A total of 409 adult patients using an autonomous wheelchair at a large academic medical center who volunteered to complete a paper survey were included. The survey was administered immediately after autonomous wheelchair use, using a cross-sectional, anonymous survey, between 15 Oct 2025 and 14 Jan 2026. Of 409 completed surveys, six were excluded because participants did not identify their endpoint for stratification purposes. Descriptive analysis included frequencies and percentages of responses.ResultsNo collisions or adverse events were observed during the pilot, and the system operated reliably within the predefined routes. Most survey respondents were first-time users (335/402 [83.3%]). A majority reported they would use the autonomous wheelchair again (341/395 [86.3%]) and would recommend it to others (364/397 [91.7%]). Overall, the experience was rated better than expected by 293 of 393 participants (74.6%). When given a choice, 271 of 379 respondents (71.5%) preferred the autonomous wheelchair over a staff-operated wheelchair.ConclusionThese findings suggest that autonomous wheelchairs are feasible and acceptable to patients in a controlled outpatient setting and support continued piloting and prospective evaluation.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionTransportation of PatientsWheelchairsAdultAgedAutonomous RobotsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care Centersautonomous wheelchairhealthcare innovationpatient experiencepatient satisfactionprimary care

Identifiers

PMID42400404
PMCPMC13333049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.