Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400357›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental botany2026

A sugar flow model predicts cell dynamics, weight, and quality of tomato at varying sink-source ratios and temperatures.

Pieter H B De Visser, Jaap Molenaar, Paul C Struik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pieter H B De VisserWageningen UR, Greenhouse Horticulture, PO Box 644, Wageningen 6700 AP, The Netherlands.
Jaap MolenaarWageningen UR, Biometris, PO Box 16, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands.
Paul C StruikWageningen UR, Crop Systems Analysis, PO Box 430, Wageningen 6700 AK, The Netherlands.

Funding

Systems biologyWageningen University & Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new tomato fruit model predicts cell numbers, cell sizes, sugar contents, and fresh weight. Transport of water and saccharides from the plant stem to fruit cells is computed following biophysical rules. The saccharide fruit sink is based on sugar metabolism, rates of cell division and expansion, and starch and cell wall dynamics. Osmotic and hydraulic potentials in cells and their vacuoles drive water import at a given cell wall extensibility. The interaction of demand and transport determines saccharide flow and biomass. We incorporated physiological responses to temperature, pruning, and plant shading. Existing and new parameters were calibrated with data from fruit heating and fruit pruning experiments of contrasting tomato cultivars. Model validation for different strategies of fruit heating and pruning, and plant shading was successful. Increased fruit temperature was shown to reduce fruit weight, as expected. Growth response to fruit pruning or shading was fully explained by changes in phloem sucrose concentration. Hydraulic conductivity of vascular tissue as well as sucrose and hexose carrier capacities were crucial fruit properties determining sugar flux. Model scenarios on knockdown of sucrose synthase and active hexose uptake affected sugar composition. The model creates an important step towards predicting fruit quality and taste under diverse growth conditions.

Indexed as

Carbohydrate MetabolismFruitSolanum lycopersicumBiological TransportModels, BiologicalTemperatureCell divisioncell expansionfruit growthfruit loadfruit qualitymetabolitesmodellingplant shadingsugar metabolismtemperature

Identifiers

PMID42400357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.