ArticleBioMed research international2026
Evaluating a Novel Cell-Free Preservation Solution for Human Cardiomyocyte Protection: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in BioMed research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluating a Novel Cell-Free Preservation Solution for Human Cardiomyocyte Protection: A Proof-of-Concept Study.BioMed research international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHeart transplantation remains the definitive therapy for end-stage heart failure; however, its clinical impact is constrained by donor availability and preservation-associated injury. Static cold storage (SCS) with cardioplegic solutions such as Custodiol is the current clinical standard of care, yet extended cold ischemia markedly increases the risk of primary graft dysfunction. There is therefore a critical need for advanced preservation strategies and solutions that maintain graft viability under both cold and normothermic conditions.
aimThis study is aimed at comparing the effects of Custodiol and the novel cell-free organ preservation solution Omnisol on contractile function, metabolic activity, and apoptosis in human cardiomyocytes under static cold and normothermic storage conditions. MATERIALS AND
methodsHuman-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes were subjected to static cold or normothermic storage in standard culture medium, Custodiol, or Omnisol, followed by functional assessment after return to standard culture medium. Contractile function was quantified using video-based motion analysis (MuscleMotion), metabolic activity was quantified by MTT assay, and cell death-associated DNA fragmentation was assessed by TUNEL staining in combination with cell morphology.
resultsFollowing normothermic preservation in Omnisol, cardiomyocyte contractility was comparable to that observed with standard culture medium, whereas Custodiol-preserved cells showed markedly reduced beating frequency, impaired contraction profiles, and delayed functional recovery. After SCS, contractile function recovered to a similar extent in Omnisol- and Custodiol-treated cells upon return to standard medium. Importantly, Omnisol-treated cardiomyocytes displayed significantly higher metabolic activity than Custodiol-treated cells under both cold and normothermic storage conditions. Apoptosis rates were comparable between groups following cold storage; however, under normothermic conditions, Custodiol treatment was associated with a significant increase in apoptotic cell death.
conclusionThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates the preservation potential of the novel cell-free preservation solution Omnisol for human cardiomyocytes under static cold and normothermic conditions. These hypothesis-generating findings support further evaluation of Omnisol as a versatile preservation solution for dynamic organ perfusion strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.