ArticlePaediatric anaesthesia2026
Perspectives in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Part 1-One Center's 15 Year Evolution in Eligibility, Utilization, Efficiency, and Outcomes.
Article in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAmbulatory surgery has become the dominant model of surgical care in the United States as surgical procedures increasingly shifted from inpatient to outpatient sites of practice. Similar growth in volumes has been observed in pediatric practice. Investigators have highlighted the challenges and opportunities in this current climate, including increasing medical and procedural complexity, difficulties matching pediatric-specific resources to meet the child's perioperative needs and unique risk profile, and limited availability of pediatric ambulatory surgical and anesthesia guidelines of care. Further, they call out the complete lack of pediatric outcomes data to help inform the creation and modification of national care guidelines.
methodsTo address these challenges, we chose to complete a comprehensive, single center retrospective review of our process, outcome, and balancing metrics contained in our EMR from our free-standing pediatric ambulatory surgery center (ASC) since its opening in July 2010 through December 2024. A commercial software system extracted de-identified, aggregated health data from the system's EMR. The data are processed and presented in statistical process control charts. This methodology allows clinicians to distinguish between common cause and special cause variation.
resultsPatient and procedural acuity increased as the system matured via lower age cutoffs and higher ASA physical status scores. This higher acuity was managed with a dynamic and evolving screening process, resulting in no change in unplanned emergency visit or hospital admissions. The COVID-19 pandemic had profound impacts on ASC operations and case mix, including a temporary closure. DISCUSSION: This retrospective, observational assessment created a detailed picture of our ASC practice changes over time. A pediatric-specific ASC with appropriate patient selection processes, practice guidelines, and clinical expertise successfully mitigated the risk of complications. These results are not generalizable to non-academic, community ambulatory facilities due to the unique characteristics of our pediatric-specific academic center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.