ArticlePaediatric anaesthesia2026
Perspectives in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Part 2-One Center's 15 Year Experience Improving Quality and Safety Outcomes.
Article in Paediatric anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perspectives in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Part 3-One Center's Evolving Regional Anesthesia Experience and Outcomes.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Perspectives in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: Part 4-Evolving Solutions in Pediatric Ambulatory Anesthesia: From Registries to a Learning Health System Approach.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPediatric ambulatory surgery has become the dominant model of surgical care in the United States, driven primarily by economic forces. There is variability in regional practice patterns, quality improvement cycles, and outcomes. Opportunity exists to overcome knowledge gaps and provide sustainable pathways of quality improvement. Our unique capability of describing the evolution of our pediatric ambulatory quality improvement practice allows us to contribute a single center's perspective.
methodsWe chose to complete a comprehensive retrospective review of our quality improvement process, outcome, and balancing metrics contained in our electronic health record (EHR) from our free-standing pediatric ambulatory surgery center (ASC) from July 2010 through December 2024. A commercial software system extracted de-identified, aggregated health data from the system's EHR. The data are processed and presented in statistical process control charts. This methodology allows clinicians to distinguish between common cause and special cause variation.
resultsImprovement themes (opioid-free anesthesia and stewardship, enhanced recovery, environmental efforts, positive deviance, and learning healthcare system) are described. Improvements in all six domains of quality (effectiveness, efficiency/timeliness, patient experience, equity, and safety) are illustrated with reliable sustainability. Our system achieved approximately a 13-fold increase in quality improvement (QI) project completion rate with self-serve, real-world data access; enabling the team to take on improvement tasks previously deemed too big, lengthy, or risky to complete. DISCUSSION: We provide preliminary evidence that these methods may be generalizable. Requirements include engaged leadership, a standard framework for improvement with experienced leadership or accessible support, and easy access to real-world electronic medical record data (i.e., learning healthcare system [LHS]). Lastly, leaders must create a culture supportive of teamwork, change, and continuous improvement. Systems facilitate adoption and hinder resistance to standards, always with implementation and sustainability in mind. Meaningful, large-scale improvements in healthcare outcomes require collaboration across LHSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.