ArticleThe clinical teacher2026
Integrated Team-Based Learning in a UK Undergraduate Medical Programme.
Article in The clinical teacher, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is limited published evidence supporting integrated team-based learning (TBL) as an effective method for teaching undergraduate medical students. This study describes student and staff perceptions, assessment outcomes and financial factors after integrated TBL was implemented into Year 1 of a large UK undergraduate medical programme.
methodsFive methods of data collection were used. An online survey was distributed to students, focus groups held with academic and technical staff, observation of teaching sessions, analysis of student assessment data and calculation of expenses for TBL delivery. Quantitative data were summarised narratively; qualitative survey data were analysed using conceptual content analysis; focus group data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis; and expenses data were summarised narratively and compared with problem-based learning (PBL).
resultsA total of 449 participants were involved in this study. Students and staff had overall positive perceptions of TBL, highlighting the engaging and consistent teaching and learning approach, effective teamworking and real-world applicability of the weekly themes. Limitations raised were focused on logistical issues such as using new technology and session timing. Compared with previous cohorts taught through PBL, assessment analysis found mixed results by assessment type. Finally, TBL was found to be more financially viable than PBL through reduced staff time requirements despite initial cost outlays.
conclusionTBL represents a potentially effective and efficient method for teaching undergraduate medical students on a large scale and should be considered by other medical programmes where increasing student numbers may affect the quality of PBL teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.