Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400095›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026

DNA and RNA metabarcoding reveal shared dominant seed-borne fungi.

Iva Franić, Patrick Sherwood, Kinga Stolarek, René Eschen, Jana Orbach, Simone Prospero, Michelle Cleary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Iva FranićSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland. iva.franic@wsl.ch.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-0956
Patrick SherwoodSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Alnarp, Sweden.
Kinga StolarekSwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Alnarp, Sweden.
René EschenCABI, Delémont, Switzerland.
Jana OrbachSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Simone ProsperoSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Michelle ClearySwedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Alnarp, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTree seeds harbor diverse fungal communities, including both pathogens and mutualists, that can influence plant health. These communities comprise living, metabolically active organisms as well as dormant or dead cells. Because only active fungi interact with their hosts, distinguishing active from inactive taxa is crucial, especially for environmental and phytosanitary monitoring. Traditional culturing methods capture living fungi but account for only a small fraction of the total fungal diversity. Currently, these methods are increasingly replaced by high-throughput DNA metabarcoding, which detects a broader range of taxa. However, DNA persists after cell death and occurs in dormant cells, preventing distinction between active and inactive fungi. In contrast, RNA metabarcoding may better reflect living fungal communities than the other two methods, though its use in assessing plant-associated fungi remains underexplored. We used culturing, DNA-, and RNA-based metabarcoding to compare fungal communities associated with seeds of three key European tree species (Fagus sylvatica, Abies alba, Pinus sylvestris).

resultsDominant fungal communities in seeds were strongly shaped by host species identity and were largely shared across DNA and RNA metabarcoding datasets, with roughly half of the most abundant genera detected by both methods. Differences between DNA- and RNA-derived communities were predominantly associated with rare taxa in the RNA dataset, although distinguishing true biological signals from noise introduced by different methodological workflows remains challenging. Several cultured genera, likely both abundant and metabolically active, were consistently detected by both approaches.

conclusionsThese results highlight the complementary nature of the three methods for characterising seed-associated fungi. Combining culturing, DNA- and RNA-based metabarcoding may provide the most comprehensive assessment of fungal diversity, while RNA metabarcoding alone offers a promising opportunity to identify the active members of fungal communities for improved environmental and phytosanitary monitoring.

Indexed as

High-throughput sequencingMetabolic activityMicrobiomePhytosanitary riskRelic DNAViable community

Identifiers

PMID42400095
PMCPMC13625387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.