Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400089›Full record

ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2026

Immersive physical and occupational therapy in the neonatal intensive care unit: a non-randomized comparative cohort trial protocol.

Dana B McCarty, Sabrina Zadrozny, Kathryn Tarnai, Catherine Ustby, Meredith Soucie, Stacey C Dusing

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06927037 (Immersive Physical Therapy in the NICU), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06927037 recruitingnot on this map

Immersive Physical Therapy in the NICU: Comparing Delivery Models to Improve Infant and Parent Outcomes

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel HillRan2025 to 2027Enrolled150ConditionsPhysical Therapy, NICU Infants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dana B McCartyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 3024 Bondurant Hall, CB#7135, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. dana_mccarty@med.unc.edu.
Sabrina ZadroznyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 3024 Bondurant Hall, CB#7135, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Kathryn TarnaiNorth Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Catherine UstbyRehabilitation Services, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Meredith SoucieRehabilitation Services, UNC Health, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Stacey C DusingDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UM1TR004406 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI NICHOLAS J SHAHEEN · 2023 to 2026
$37.5M
FPTR Paris Patla Physical Therapy Research GrantNCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) benefit most from occupational therapy (OT) and physical therapy (PT) when delivered at high frequencies. However, implementing these recommendations in clinical practice remains challenging. This study will investigate the impact of different therapy care delivery models on extremely preterm infants and their mothers.

methodsThis pilot study uses a non-randomized comparative cohort design with historical controls. A retrospective cohort of 30 infants will represent usual care therapies (UCT). Two prospective cohorts (n = 30 each) will be enrolled following the launch of a new Small Baby Unit (SBU) at a Level IV NICU. The first prospective group will receive UCT within the SBU (SBU + UCT), while the second will receive an Immersive Therapy Model (SBU + ITM). Mothers of infants in the prospective groups will be invited to participate. The SBU introduces developmentally supportive medical and environmental protocols, with ITM adding structured, high-frequency therapy as well as parent-delivered developmental activities. As a pilot study, primary outcomes include the following: (1) feasibility of ITM implementation, measured by changes in therapy frequency and parent-administered activities and (2) comparisons of infant motor and neurobehavioral outcomes, as well as maternal stress and parenting competence. Secondarily, we will evaluate the preliminary efficacy of the SBU + ITM model on infant motor and neurobehavioral outcomes, as well as maternal stress and sense of competence. Finally, we will explore the ITM's potential influence on two important drivers of health care costs in the NICU as compared to UCT: (1) time to infant achievement of independent oral feeds and (2) length of hospitalization. DISCUSSION: Findings may inform neonatal physical and occupational therapy practices by evaluating a novel care model aimed at improving outcomes for both infants and parents. Given its practical implementation and potential for significant impact, the ITM could represent a paradigm shift in NICU-based therapy care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06927037, Registered 16 April 2025, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06927037?intr=Immersive%20Physical%20Therapy&term=preterm%20infant&rank=1 . PROTOCOL NUMBER: Version 5, 2/16/2026.

Identifiers

PMID42400089
PMCPMC13599279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.