ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Comparative effects of pilates-based interventions on functional mobility, balance, fatigue, and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePilates-based exercise has gained attention as a non-pharmacological rehabilitation strategy for people with multiple sclerosis (MS), yet the comparative effectiveness of different Pilates modalities remains uncertain. This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluated and ranked Pilates-based interventions for functional mobility, balance, walking performance, fatigue, and health-related quality of life in adults with MS.
methodsPubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to October 24, 2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials of structured Pilates-based interventions lasting at least four weeks in adults with MS. The primary outcome was functional mobility measured by the Timed Up and Go test. Secondary outcomes included balance, walking endurance, fatigue, walking performance, and MS-specific quality of life. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was performed; treatment ranking was summarized using SUCRA, risk of bias using RoB 2, and certainty of evidence using GRADE-NMA through CINeMA.
resultsTwenty-two randomized controlled trials involving 901 participants were included. Pilates ranked first for functional mobility and significantly improved Timed Up and Go performance versus control (MD: -5.23 s; 95% CI: -6.39 to -4.06). It also ranked first for balance, with a mean improvement of 8.58 points on the Berg Balance Scale (95% CI: 7.86 to 9.30). Pilates combined with Pilates-based telerehabilitation ranked highest for the 6-Minute Walk Test (MD: 50.81 m; 95% CI: 0.16 to 101.46) and significantly improved Fatigue Severity Scale scores. Home-based Pilates showed the largest reduction in Modified Fatigue Impact Scale scores. No comparison reached high certainty under GRADE-NMA.
conclusionPilates-based interventions may improve mobility, balance, walking endurance, fatigue, and quality of life in people with MS. Sparse networks, risk of bias, heterogeneity, imprecision, and limited follow-up warrant cautious interpretation. Adequately powered trials with standardized protocols are needed before routine implementation can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.