Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400057›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

TaILOR: a randomised trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) strategy compared to standard care pathways in people with inflammatory arthritis: a study protocol.

Gretchen Brewer, Victoria Harris, Christopher Mwema, Abhishek Abhishek, Ailsa Bosworth, Christine Bundy, Clare Clark, Elizabeth Conroy, Helen Dakin, Emma Dures and 11 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Gretchen BrewerUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Victoria HarrisUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Christopher MwemaUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abhishek AbhishekUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Ailsa BosworthNational Rheumatoid Arthritis Society, Berkshire, UK.
Christine BundyCardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Clare ClarkNational Axial Spondyloarthritis Society (NASS), London, UK.
Elizabeth ConroyUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Helen DakinUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emma DuresUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Joe EddisonNational Axial Spondyloarthritis Society (NASS), London, UK.
Anne FrancisUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
James GallowayKing's College London, London, UK.
Alice JenningsUniversity of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
Helen Lall, London, UK.
Elizabeth MacPhieLancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.
Sam NortonKing's College London, London, UK.
Mark PerryUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Jane RaleighNHS England, London, UK.
Mel Brooke TurfreyBritPACT Patient Group, Bath, UK.
Laura CoatesUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Laura.coates@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory arthritis comprises lifelong conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis that require long-term treatment and regular monitoring. People with inflammatory arthritis usually require long-term treatment with immune-suppressing medications and are typically reviewed in outpatient clinics every 6-12 months, accounting for 1.3 million appointments/year in the UK. The National Health Service (NHS) is implementing a move to patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU) where patients request appointments as required. To date, there are small studies of PIFU in rheumatoid arthritis and none in other arthritis. Research is required to configure services to optimise outcomes, inform patients and clinicians of the effectiveness and safety of PIFU and ensure that suitable patients are selected for this pathway.

methodsTaILOR is a two-arm, pragmatic, parallel group, superiority, randomised controlled clinical study, with an embedded qualitative study conducted across 32 secondary care NHS sites in the UK. Eligible participants must be 18 years or older, with stable inflammatory arthritis, and diagnosed for at least 2 years. In addition, they need to be suitable for PIFU based on NHS England guidance and in the opinion of their usual care team; 438 participants will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio to either PIFU, with a fixed 24-month safety net appointment, or standard care, with 6-12 monthly follow-up visits. The trial includes an internal recruitment feasibility pilot, as well as health economics and qualitative analyses. The primary outcome will assess the effectiveness of PIFU compared to standard care on musculoskeletal quality of life at 24 months. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, incremental costs, cost-effectiveness, treatment escalation, disease activity, flares, patient confidence in interactions with their clinical team (patient perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions), depression and acceptability of PIFU (via qualitative interviews). DISCUSSION: As a national multi-centre study, this will provide the definitive evaluation of PIFU for inflammatory arthritis. Qualitative analysis will generate insights into individual and contextual factors affecting the acceptability of PIFU, identify variation across sites or between patients and provide information on how this can be addressed.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCN10480648. Registered on 17 January 2025. Protocol version {2}: Version 3.0 date 04 Dec 2025.

Indexed as

ArthritisArthritis, RheumatoidCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicHealth Care CostsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicQuality of LifeResearch DesignState MedicineTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomInflammatory arthritisMusculoskeletalPatient Initiated Follow up (PIFU)Patient-led follow-upPatient-triggered follow-upQuality of lifeStandard careSupported self-managed follow-up

Identifiers

PMID42400057
PMCPMC13343589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.