Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400054›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2026

Longitudinal evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte scoring using automated region of interest registration in breast cancer.

Alessio Fiorin, Laia Adalid-Llansa, Laia Reverté, Esther Sauras-Colón, Noèlia Gallardo-Borràs, Hatem A Rashwan, Ramon Bosch-Príncep, Alba Fischer-Carles, Elena Goyda, Marylène Lejeune and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Alessio FiorinOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain. alessio.fiorin@estudiants.urv.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0315-1085
Laia Adalid-LlansaOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7543-9921
Laia RevertéOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4690-2387
Esther Sauras-ColónOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1649-938X
Noèlia Gallardo-BorràsOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain. noelia.gallardo@estudiants.urv.cat.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8537-4586
Hatem A RashwanDepartment of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5421-1637
Ramon Bosch-PríncepOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4104-5515
Alba Fischer-CarlesOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7733-015X
Elena GoydaOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-8797-9269
Marylène LejeuneOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8441-9404
Daniel Mata-CanoOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7543-4856
Domènec PuigDepartment of Computer Engineering and Mathematics, Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV), Tarragona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0562-4205
Tábata Sánchez-AlcántaraOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8797-5347
Mikel Relloso Ortiz de UriarteOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1867-1822
Montserrat Llobera-SerentillOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.
José Antonio Izuel-NavarroOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.
Carlos López-PabloOncological Pathology and Bioinformatics Research Group, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica Catalunya Sud (IRB CatSud), Tortosa, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1248-3065

Funding

HORIZON-MSCA-2021-DN-01-01 101073222SCARLET TED2021-130081B-C22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer (BC), particularly in HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes. Assessment follows the international guidelines, in which pathologists evaluate whole hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides while integrating representative regions of the invasive tumor. However, manual region selection can be labor-intensive, subjective, and may introduce variability, particularly across consecutive tissue sections. Automated region of interest (ROI) registration may mitigate this limitation, yet its impact on longitudinal TIL scoring has not been systematically evaluated. Here, we introduce three ROI registration strategies (direct, intermediate, and serial with/without quality control) and present an automated framework validated for consistent TIL scoring and clinical relevance in predicting relapse.

methodsWe analyzed 104 invasive BC cases, each with 12 consecutive H&E slides. A pathologist annotated ROIs on both the first and twelfth slides. We registered these ROIs using the proposed strategies. We then evaluated them with performance metrics, including Intersection over Union (IoU), Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), failure rate, and execution time. Two pathologists scored TILs on manual and automated ROIs. We assessed longitudinal consistency between the first manual ROI and the twelfth slide's corresponding ROIs. We also tested whether the association between TIL score and patient relapse outcomes was preserved.

resultsThe direct registration strategy achieved the highest geometric accuracy (mean IoU = 0.650, DSC = 0.769), with < 1% failure rate and ∼5.8 s execution time. TIL scores for both manual and automated ROIs closely matched (P = 0.84), showing strong agreement (Spearman's ρ = 0.923, ICC = 0.936, CCC = 0.915, Cohen's κ = 0.786). Longitudinal analyses showed no significant variability across distant sections (P = 0.79 and P = 0.62). TIL concentrations differed significantly between patients with and without relapse, and this association was preserved on both the first and twelfth slides (P < 0.05).

conclusionsWe present the first automated framework for longitudinal ROI registration to support TIL scoring in BC. By reducing manual effort and variability, the framework supports scalable evaluation of immune biomarkers across tissue depth while preserving clinically relevant signals, supporting precision immuno-oncology applications.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLongitudinal StudiesNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerHistopathologyImage registrationTumor-infiltrating lymphocytesWhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID42400054
PMCPMC13602670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.