ArticleBMC health services research2026
Artificial intelligence integration and patient safety culture: a cross-sectional study of healthcare professionals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis cross-sectional study investigates healthcare practitioners' perceptions of the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance patient safety culture in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, conducted from March to June 2025. The focus is on understanding how AI is perceived in the context of improving patient safety culture and aligning with Saudi Vision 2030 goals.
methodsThe study employed a cross-sectional design and administered self-administered online surveys via convenience sampling among healthcare practitioners across multiple healthcare settings in Riyadh. The study targeted a population including doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals. A structured questionnaire was developed to assess perceptions of AI, including key variables such as perceived AI benefits, concerns about data privacy, and the necessity of training. Descriptive statistics were computed to characterize the sample, including age, gender, and profession.
resultsFindings revealed that most participants perceived AI as supportive of patient safety through improved diagnostic accuracy, reduced medical errors, and streamlined workflows, which participants believed may contribute to a stronger patient safety culture. Descriptive analyses suggested variation in perceptions across professional groups. DISCUSSION: The study found that healthcare practitioners in Riyadh generally perceived AI as a potentially valuable tool for supporting patient safety culture, particularly through improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing errors; however, concerns about data privacy and insufficient training remain significant barriers that must be addressed to ensure effective and safe AI integration.
conclusionsThis study highlighted healthcare practitioners' positive perception of AI's role in enhancing patient safety culture in Riyadh. While AI is seen as beneficial in improving accuracy and reducing errors, challenges such as data privacy concerns and a lack of training were identified as barriers to its implementation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.