ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Blunted exercise-induced hypoalgesia in people with knee pain after a brief low-intensity warm-up: a split-body study with and without blood flow restriction.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perioperative Dynamic Changes and Independent Associations of Pressure Pain Threshold in Trauma Patients: A Prospective Longitudinal Study.Pain research & management · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) is vital for rehabilitation, but its efficacy in patients with knee pain remains controversial. Blood flow restriction (BFR) might augment analgesia through metabolic accumulation. This study aimed to investigate the acute analgesic impact of a low-intensity warm-up with or without BFR and to compare EIH responses between healthy individuals and patients with persistent knee pain.
methodsForty-six participants (healthy controls: n = 26; participants with persistent knee pain: n = 20) were enrolled in a single-session, within-subject split-body protocol. BFR at 70% arterial occlusion pressure was applied to one limb during a 5-min low-intensity warm-up. The BFR-treated limb was randomized in healthy controls, whereas in participants with persistent knee pain, BFR was consistently applied to the symptomatic limb, with the contralateral asymptomatic limb serving as the within-subject comparison. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were measured at three peri-patellar sites pre- and post-condition using a Latin Square design. Data were analyzed via Linear Mixed Models.
resultsHealthy controls showed a robust increase in PPT after warm-up (+ 5.55 N, 95% CI, 4.20 to 6.90), whereas participants with persistent knee pain showed no clear increase (+ 0.15 N, 95% CI, -1.39 to 1.69). The between-group difference in EIH was significant (+ 5.40 N, 95% CI, 3.36 to 7.45, p < 0.001). The EIH response was markedly attenuated in participants with persistent knee pain, a finding consistent with altered endogenous pain modulation. However, the present data do not directly identify the central or peripheral mechanisms underlying this attenuation. The additional BFR effect was small and not statistically significant (-0.14 N; 95% CI, -2.18 to 1.91; p = 0.894), suggesting the tested BFR protocol did not demonstrate statistically superior additional hypoalgesic effects compared with the non-BFR condition.
conclusionA brief low-intensity warm-up induced a clear EIH response in healthy controls, whereas participants with persistent knee pain showed a markedly attenuated response. The tested BFR protocol did not demonstrate statistically superior additional hypoalgesic effects compared with the non-BFR condition. These exploratory findings warrant further investigation using adequately powered, prespecified, and mechanistically informed studies.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300069386 ( https://www.chictr.org.cn/ , registered on 15 March 2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.