ArticleHarm reduction journal2026
Patterns, motivations, and healthcare experiences of medical cannabis use among gender and sexuality diverse people in Australia: findings from the Cannabis as Medicine Survey 2022 (CAMS-22).
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLGBTQA+ people are at greater risk of using cannabis at earlier ages, in greater frequencies and quantities and over longer periods of time compared with their cisgendered, heterosexual peers. Prescribed medicinal cannabis is becoming increasingly commonly utilised in Australia to treat a variety of conditions including pain, mental health diagnoses and sleep. There is currently little research looking into the motivations and experiences of LGBTQA+ people accessing medical cannabis (MC) through healthcare providers.
objectivesTo explore differences in patterns, reasons for using, and experiences of accessing medicinal cannabis between LGBTQA+ people and their cisgender, heterosexual peers.
methodsWe utilised data collected from an online anonymous cross-sectional survey of individuals (CAMS-22 survey), consisting of adult Australians who had utilised cannabis to treat a medical condition in the previous year. Participants were asked questions about their gender and sexuality, demographic characteristics, patterns and characteristics of MC use, conditions treated, and accessibility to and satisfaction of treatment.
resultsOf the 3107 respondents included in these analyses, 2332 (77.3%) self-identified as heterosexual and 686 (22.7%) as sexually diverse. Over 95% of participants identified as cisgender (n = 2932), with only 148 (4.8%) identifying as trans. Sexually diverse participants commenced regular MC use at an earlier age, were more likely to identify a mental health condition and less likely to identify pain as their primary reason for MC consumption, and reported less satisfaction with treatment compared to heterosexuals-primarily around provision of information. Trans participants commenced MC use at an earlier age; were more likely to identify a mental health condition or sleep as their primary reason for MC use; and also reported less satisfaction with treatment than their cisgender counterparts for more interpersonal reasons.
conclusionLGBTQA+ people use cannabis for medical purposes at significantly earlier ages and primarily to address mental health and substance use concerns. Future research should explore ways in which prescribers can specifically tailor support to meet all physical and mental health needs of LGBTQA+ people, (beyond simply prescribing MC), not only through treatments that they offer, but also through adjunct and complementary services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.