ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2026
A pre-illness reference reminder alters cross-sectional patient-reported outcome responses: evidence from EQ-5D-5L and EQ-HWB-9.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate whether a brief pre-survey reminder prompting patients to reflect on their pre-illness health was associated with altered response patterns in cross-sectional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 244 inpatients in a hepatobiliary surgery department. Participants were assigned to a control group (standard recall instructions for the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-HWB-9) or a reminder group (identical instructions, preceded by the reminder). Response distributions were compared descriptively, and adjusted ordered logistic regression models were used to assess the association between the reminder and reported problem severity.
resultsA total of 244 inpatients participated, with 123 in the control group and 121 receiving the pre-illness reminder. There were no missing data for the EQ-5D-5L or EQ-HWB-9 items, and EQ VAS data were missing for three participants only. The reminder group reported lower ceiling effects and higher problem severity across both instruments. In adjusted analyses, the reminder was associated with higher odds of reporting more severe problems across all EQ-5D-5L dimensions, with odds ratios ranging from 1.90 to 3.13, and across seven of the nine EQ-HWB-9 items, with odds ratios ranging from 1.94 to 5.43. The reminder group also reported a lower mean EQ VAS score than the control group: 78.23 versus 82.03, p = 0.002.
conclusionsThe brief reminder was associated with more severe and differentiated PROM responses. These findings suggest that a pre-illness reference reminder may influence respondents' appraisal of current health in cross-sectional PROM assessment. However, without an objective benchmark for true health status, the findings should be interpreted as consistent with, but not definitive evidence of, a recalibration-related response process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.