Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42399959›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2026

A k-mer-based estimator of the substitution rate between repetitive sequences.

Haonan Wu, Antonio Blanca, Paul Medvedev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haonan WuDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, 16801, USA.
Antonio Blanca *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, 16801, USA.
Paul Medvedev *Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, 16801, USA. pzm11@psu.edu.

Funding

Leveraging k-mer sketching statistics to enhance metagenomic methods and alignment algorithmsR01GM146462 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Antonio Blanca Pimentel, David Koslicki · 2022 to 2026
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM146462NIH R01GM146462NIH HHS R01GM146462NSF DBI2138585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundK-mer-based analysis of genomic data is ubiquitous, but the presence of repetitive k-mers continues to pose problems for the accuracy of many methods. For example, the Mash tool (Ondov et al 2016) can accurately estimate the substitution rate between two low-repetitive sequences from their k-mer sketches; however, it is inaccurate on repetitive sequences such as the centromere of a human chromosome. Follow-up work by Blanca et al. (2021) has attempted to model how mutations affect k-mer sets based on strong assumptions that the sequence is non-repetitive and that mutations do not create spurious k-mer matches. However, the theoretical foundations for extending an estimator like Mash to work in the presence of repeat sequences have been lacking.

resultsIn this work, we relax the non-repetitive assumption and propose a novel estimator for the mutation rate. We derive theoretical bounds on our estimator's bias. Our experiments show that it remains accurate for repetitive genomic sequences, such as the alpha satellite higher order repeats in centromeres. We demonstrate our estimator's robustness across diverse datasets and various ranges of the substitution rate and k-mer size. Finally, we show how sketching can be used to avoid dealing with large k-mer sets while retaining accuracy. Our software is available at https://github.com/medvedevgroup/Repeat-Aware_Substitution_Rate_Estimator .

Indexed as

k-mersMutation ratesSketching

Identifiers

PMID42399959
PMCPMC13602792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.