ArticleChiropractic & manual therapies2026
Prevalence of the imposter phenomenon among chiropractors in South Africa: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Chiropractic & manual therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Imposter Phenomenon (IP)-doubting one's abilities despite clear achievements-is well-documented among healthcare professionals but has never been studied among practicing chiropractors, who face unique challenges including professional isolation and ambiguous healthcare identity. This study aimed to determine IP prevalence among South African chiropractors and investigate associations with age, gender, years of experience, and province.
methodsA cross-sectional survey using the validated Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (CIPS) was distributed via email to all 960 chiropractors registered with the Allied Health Professions Council of South Africa. Data were collected online from 25 March to 17 May 2024. Descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were used; results are interpreted through effect sizes (Cohen's d) and 95% confidence intervals, with exact p-values reported as continuous evidence measures. Cronbach's alpha assessed reliability. The study followed STROBE and CHERRIES guidelines.
resultsOf 159 chiropractors (16.6% response rate), mean age was 37.8 years (SD = 10.8); 61.6% were female. Mean CIPS score was 50.78 (SD = 16.82), indicating moderate IP. Severity distribution: 33.3% few, 39.0% moderate, 22.6% frequent, 5.0% intense IP (66.6% at or above moderate threshold). Females scored higher than males (55.66 vs. 42.93; t(147.69)= - 5.25, p < 0.001; d = 0.85). Chiropractors ≤ 35 years scored higher than those > 35 years (53.52 vs. 47.95; t(152) = 2.05, p = 0.042; d = 0.33). Chiropractors with ≤ 10 years of experience showed a non-significant trend toward higher IP scores than those with > 10 years (52.90 vs. 47.94; two-tailed p = 0.066; d = 0.30). No provincial differences were found (F(3,155) = 0.62, p = 0.601). Cronbach's α was 0.94.
conclusionsModerate to intense IP affects two-thirds of chiropractors in this South African sample, particularly females and early-career practitioners. These findings highlight the need for targeted mental health interventions, mentorship, and peer support. This first study of IP among practicing chiropractors provides evidence for practitioner well-being initiatives with implications for chiropractic education, professional development, and retention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.