ArticleBMC public health2026
Bridging systems for health equity: a scoping review of municipal-public health partnerships.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMunicipalities influence population health outcomes both directly (e.g., fluoridation, road safety, and tobacco control) and indirectly through broader social, cultural, and environmental determinants of health such as housing, transportation, income, and social services. While intersectoral partnerships with public health systems are promoted as a policy tool for addressing complex health inequities, evidence on their models, effectiveness, and outcomes remains limited.
methodsThis scoping review aimed to map the literature on municipal-public health partnerships, with a focus on partnership models, reported outcomes, and the barriers and facilitators shaping their success. From 1,392 records, 105 studies were included.
resultsTwo broad partnership models emerged: (1) ad-hoc, project-based collaborations, and (2) institutionalized collaborations, including intergovernmental relations, Health in All Policies, and strategic planning arrangements. Barriers included inadequate funding (48 studies), cultural and relational mismatches (33), system fragmentation and data-sharing challenges (32), and additional sub-themes under governance or leadership gaps. Facilitators included community engagement (34), capacity building (33), and sub-themes related to strong leadership or policy champions. Most studies (65%) focused solely on the implementation process of partnerships, while only nine studies (8%) examined health outcomes, reporting associations with improvements in areas such as smoking cessation and transportation equity. Municipal-public health partnerships are diverse yet under-evaluated, with the literature still dominated by process-focused studies and limited outcome or impact assessments.
conclusionRecent evaluation guidance calls for broader outcome, impact, economic, and mixed-methods approaches, not only causal designs, so partnerships can be meaningfully assessed for their contributions to health equity and population health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.