ArticleBMC medical education2026
Curricular advances to develop medical students' knowledge, skills, and attitudes in health advocacy.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe American Medical Association's Declaration of Professional Responsibility is an important covenant obligating present-day physicians to transcend personal beliefs and affiliations to advocate for changes that alleviate suffering and promote human health. Despite this recognition of advocacy as a pillar of physician duty, advocacy training in undergraduate medical education remains variable across institutions, elective in nature, and often insufficient in developing trainees' professional identities and competence as health advocates.
methodsEducators at the UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine designed and delivered a novel half-day session required for all first-year medical students to nurture their professional identities as health advocates and empower them with knowledge, skills, and attitudes (KSA) needed to give voice to issues impacting the patients and communities they serve. Students attended a shared didactic followed by two focused workshops. The session was conducted annually from 2023-2025. Pre- and post-session data was collected after each iteration to evaluate changes in KSA.
resultsA total of 509 first-year medical students participated in the session from 2023-2025 with 477 (94%) partaking in the session synchronously. All 509 participants (100%) completed at least one survey, and 361 (71%) completed both pre- and post-surveys. Pooled data showed that participation led to statistically significant improvement on a 7-point Likert scale at similar rates in all three cohorts in each of the measured domains: knowledge (Δ1.45, p < 0.001), skills (Δ1.37, p < 0.001), and attitudes (Δ0.44, p < 0.001).
conclusionsA required half-day advocacy session supported trainees in developing their professional identities and acquiring foundational KSA needed to fulfill their roles as health advocates. Implementing this session across institutions can broaden its impact. Longitudinal data collection can clarify its long-term influence on physician engagement in advocacy and on health outcomes of patients and communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.