ArticleBMC oral health2026
Exploring human factors that affect patient safety in dentistry: a qualitative study of hospital-based practice.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis qualitative study explores how hospital-based dental professionals in Pakistan perceive and navigate human factors that influence patient safety, with particular attention to the structural and cultural contexts of low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Pakistan. MATERIALS AND
methodsA qualitative exploratory design grounded in the SEIPS (Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety) framework was employed. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants with clinical experience in hospital-based dentistry. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and thematically analysed using Braun and Clarke's framework, with deductive mapping to SEIPS domains. Member checking and coder triangulation supported analytical rigour.
resultsFollowing interviews with 29 participants, three interrelated domains emerged: (1) Individual-level preconditions for safe practice, such as fatigue, emotional stress, and cultural sensitivity; (2) Team and process-level factors, including hierarchical barriers, communication gaps, and reliance on experienced support staff; and (3) Organisational and systemic conditions, including inadequate infrastructure, time pressure, and punitive supervisory cultures. These factors interact dynamically to affect clinical decision-making and procedural safety.
conclusionHuman factors shape patient safety in dental hospitals, particularly within LMIC contexts where structural limitations and cultural norms amplify existing risks. Addressing these challenges requires context-sensitive safety protocols, enhanced communication frameworks, ergonomic reforms, and supportive supervision. Findings underline the importance of integrating human factors education into dental curricula and governance to promote a culture of safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.