ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Computational fluid dynamics evaluation of physician-modified stent graft repair for distal residual stanford type B aortic dissection.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of stent graft geometry on hemodynamics in superior mesenteric artery reconstruction after fenestrated/branched endovascular aneurysm repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFew studies have focused on physician-modified stent grafts (PMEGs) for treating distal residual dissection in type B aortic dissection (TBAD). This study aimed to assess the usage of PMEGs in the treatment of distal residual dissection of TBAD by analyzing the relevant hemodynamical indicators.
methodsPatients with TBAD underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair surgery in the first stage, and in the second stage PMEGs were used to repair the residual dissection. Computational fluid dynamics and three-dimensional structural analyses were performed, based on computed tomography angiography datasets. The prognostic post-implantation improvement was studied using both quantitative and qualitative functional analysis.
resultsA total of 30 patients with TBAD were enrolled. Following the PMEGs procedure, peak systolic pressure in all aortic segments trended downward without statistical significance. Overall time-averaged wall shear stress (TAWSS) increased significantly (P = 0.007), especially in the S2 segment (P = 0.005), while overall oscillatory shear index decreased significantly (P = 0.010). Superior mesenteric artery blood flow was significantly higher postoperatively (P = 0.005), with no significant differences in other visceral branches. At 1‑year follow-up, false lumen volume was markedly reduced (P < 0.001) and true lumen volume increased, suggesting favorable aortic remodeling.
conclusionsThe PMEGs technique effectively ameliorates hemodynamic parameters in patients with residual distal dissection following TBAD. However, long-term follow-up of the increase in TAWSS is still required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.