SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
A core outcome measurement set for hyperemesis gravidarum research: a consensus study.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOutcome reporting in hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) research lacks standardization, which hampers the aggregation of data. A core outcome set (COS) for HG research has been developed to increase standardization. While a COS represents which key outcomes should be measured, it does not describe how and when they should be measured. Our aim was to develop a consensus-based core outcome measurement set for HG complementing the existing COS for HG.
methodThis study included multiple phases: (1) systematic review to identify all existing outcome measurement instrument (OMI)s in HG research; (2) a consensus meeting with the steering committee of this study to vote for one best OMI per outcome; (3) a modified Delphi consultation survey of at least 100 stakeholders including patients, obstetric healthcare professionals, other healthcare professionals and researchers to achieve consensus on one OMI per outcome.
resultsThe literature review identified 362 unique OMIs in 461 studies. The modified Delphi consultation round included 155 stakeholders including researchers (12.3%), women or families with lived experiences (51%), obstetric healthcare professionals (20%), and other healthcare professionals (12.9%) representing 10 countries. We achieved consensus (> 70% agreement) on all 24 OMIs presented during the Delphi survey including validated questionnaires such as the Pregnancy Unique Quantification of Emesis 24 h (PUQE-24) score and the EQ-5D-5 L as well as standardized definitions for outcomes such as preterm birth and babies small-for-gestational-age. Consensus was achieved on an OMI for each outcome included in the COS.
conclusionsWe developed a consensus-based set of core outcome measurements to record the previously established COS for studies in HG. This core outcome measurement set describes how outcomes included in the COS should be measured and reported. The COS and core outcome measurement set should be used in all future HG trials. This will help further standardize outcome selection, collection, and reporting in HG trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.