Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42399832›Full record

Observational studyBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Development and validation of machine learning models for obstructive sleep apnea risk stratification in high-risk pregnant women.

Yu Wang, Kaiwen Wang, Xiaying Niu, Xuexin Wang, Zhifang Hu, Nan Shen, TingTing Jiang, Tong Tong, Hong Gao, Jing Ma and 1 more

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Yu WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.251, Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing, 100026, China.
Kaiwen WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.251, Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing, 100026, China.
Xiaying NiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.251, Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing, 100026, China.
Xuexin WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.251, Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing, 100026, China.
Zhifang HuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.251, Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing, 100026, China.
Nan ShenDepartment of Obstetrics, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing, China.
TingTing JiangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.251, Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing, 100026, China.
Tong TongDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.251, Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing, 100026, China.
Hong GaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.251, Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing, 100026, China. helen31198@ccmu.edu.cn.
Jing MaDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, NO.8, Xishiku Rd, Beijing, 100034, China. majjmail@163.com.
Lin ZhangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, No.251, Yaojiayuan Rd, Beijing, 100026, China. zhanglinbjfcyy@ccmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program PX2022058Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University FCYYLC202506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects approximately 15% of pregnancies and is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Although polysomnography (PSG) is the diagnostic gold standard, increasing clinical demand creates substantial bottlenecks in manual PSG scoring and specialist review. Conventional screening tools often show limited discriminative ability in high-risk referred populations. Therefore, optimized risk stratification models are needed to streamline clinical workflows, prioritize diagnostic resource allocation, and facilitate timely intervention for high-risk pregnant patients.

methodsThis retrospective observational cohort study recruited pregnant women with suspected OSA who underwent level 2 portable PSG. Six machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost, logistic regression, GBM, neural networks, KNN, and AdaBoost, were constructed based on integrated clinical and oximetry features. Feature importance screening and DeLong's test-based pairwise comparison were performed to determine the optimal feature combination for model construction. The primary outcome was any OSA defined by an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 5 events/h, while the secondary outcome was moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15 events/h). All models were optimized using 10-fold cross-validation and externally validated on an independent testing set. Model performance was comprehensively assessed via receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsAmong the 667 enrolled participants, 305 (45.7%) were diagnosed with OSA. The 3% oxygen desaturation index, lowest SpO2, body mass index, waist circumference, and abdominal circumference were identified as core predictive variables. For the primary screening of any OSA, logistic regression and neural networks achieved robust and comparable discriminative performance; the logistic regression model attained a testing-set AUC of 0.872 with a sensitivity of 78.0%. For moderate-to-severe OSA prediction, AdaBoost and GBM exhibited excellent predictive efficacy, with testing-set AUCs of 0.956 and 0.955, respectively. DCA confirmed that the established models yield favorable clinical net benefit across broad risk threshold ranges, enabling optimized clinical screening and priority referral strategies.

conclusionsThis machine learning-based risk stratification framework demonstrates promising diagnostic performance for identifying OSA in symptomatic pregnant women under clinical referral. Leveraging structured medical records incorporating sleep history and physical measurements, this tool serves as an auxiliary triage strategy to assist clinical decision-making. The proposed models may help identify high-risk patients for expedited PSG assessment, which has the potential to optimize diagnostic workflows and improve resource allocation in specialized obstetric sleep medicine services.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPregnancy ComplicationsSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsPolysomnographyPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentArtificial intelligenceMachine learningObstructive sleep apneaPolysomnographyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42399832
PMCPMC13602464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.