Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42399823›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Eight weeks of visual perturbation training effects on unanticipated cutting lower-limb biomechanics and errors in male athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT).

Ebrahim Heidarnia, Mostafa Zarei, Dustin R Grooms, Tohid Seif Barghi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ebrahim HeidarniaFaculty of Sport Science and Health, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Mostafa ZareiFaculty of Sport Science and Health, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. zareeimostafa@yahoo.com.
Dustin R GroomsDepartment of Physical Therapy, Ohio Musculoskeletal & Neurological Institute, College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Tohid Seif BarghiDepartment of Sports Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

Iran National Science Foundation 4037751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are among the most common knee injuries, leading to joint instability, muscle weakness, and disrupted motor coordination. The neuromuscular consequences of ACL injury extend beyond the joint and surrounding musculature and also involve reorganization of the central nervous system. Current return-to-sport training protocols may not adequately restore subtle neuromuscular deficits associated with ACL injury neuroplasticity. Specifically, impaired neuromuscular control under visual or cognitive perturbations. These neuromuscular deficits are especially evident during unanticipated cutting maneuvers, which place high demands on rapid motor control and decision-making.

methodsTwenty-four ACLR male athletes who had returned to sport were randomly assigned to a visual-cognitive neuromuscular training (VCNT) group (n = 12) or the VCNT with added visual perturbation via stroboscopic glasses (VCNT-S, n = 12). The primary outcome was lower-limb biomechanics during unanticipated cutting; secondary outcomes included cutting-task cognitive error. participants performed an unanticipated cutting maneuver (30-40°change of direction guided by two taped ground lines) in a biomechanics lab before and after an 8-week intervention (3 sessions/week). The outcome assessor was blinded to group allocation.

resultsAll 24 participants (12 per group) were analyzed; no adverse events occurred. Compared with VCNT, VCNT-S showed greater reductions in involved knee abduction torque (mean difference: -0.08 Nm/kg, 95% CI: -0.14 to -0.02) and involved ground reaction force (mean difference: -0.39 BW, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.23). VCNT-S also demonstrated greater improvements in involved knee flexion ROM (mean difference: +7.71°, 95% CI: 2.26° to 13.16°), uninvolved peak knee flexion (mean difference: +5.68°, 95% CI: 3.03° to 8.33°), and uninvolved peak hip flexion (mean difference: +7.64°, 95% CI: 3.50° to 11.78°), as well as greater reductions in involved knee abduction ROM (mean difference: -1.97°, 95% CI: -3.15° to -0.79°) and uninvolved peak knee abduction (mean difference: -2.85°, 95% CI: -5.52° to -0.18°). Cutting-task errors were reduced more in VCNT-S (-40.5% vs. -14.7%; mean difference: -25.8%, 95% CI: -47.2% to -4.4%; p = 0.02).

conclusionIncorporating visual perturbation into neuromuscular training improved lower-limb biomechanics and reduced cognitive errors during unanticipated cutting compared to standard training. These surrogate outcomes suggest potential for modifying re-injury risk factors, through direct injury endpoints were not measured.

trial registrationIranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) at https://www.irct.ir/search/result?query=IRCT20250314065070N1 , IRCT20250314065070N1, Date of Registration: 2025-06-03, (retrospective registration).

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionLower ExtremityAdolescentAdultAthletesBiomechanical PhenomenaCognitive TrainingHumansMaleReturn to SportTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnterior cruciate Ligament reconstruction (ACLR)Neuromuscular trainingRehabilitationVisual perturbation

Identifiers

PMID42399823
PMCPMC13613750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.