ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Comparison of three fixation methods for posterolateral fragments in tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTibial plateau fractures involving posterolateral fragments are challenging to fix internally because of the small surface area and the complex regional anatomy. This study aimed to compare the biomechanical performance of three plate fixation methods and to identify the construct most resistant to fracture displacement under axial loading.
methodsFifteen synthetic tibia models were used to simulate posterolateral split fractures. The models were randomized into three groups (n = 5 per group): Group A received an R-LOCK locking plate with 3.5 mm locking screws; Group B received a small T-oblique dynamic compression plate (DCP) with 3.5-mm cortical screws; and Group C received a distal radius T-oblique locking compression plate (LCP) with 2.7 mm locking screws. Vertical displacement was measured under sequential axial loads of 500, 1000, and 1500 N, followed by load-to-failure testing. Because each specimen was tested under multiple loading conditions, vertical displacement was analysed by mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA (within-subject factor, loading condition; between-subject factor, implant group), equivalent in this balanced design to a random-intercept linear mixed-effects model with specimen as the random grouping factor. Per-load one-way ANOVAs were used as a secondary analysis for pairwise comparisons.
resultsFor vertical displacement, the primary mixed-design repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of load (p < 0.001), only a marginal main effect of implant group (p = 0.077), and a non-significant group × load interaction (p = 0.289). Based on secondary per-load analyses, Group C demonstrated significantly less vertical displacement than Group A and Group B under low-to-moderate axial loading at both 500 N (0.219 ± 0.036 mm vs. 0.359 ± 0.092 mm and 0.329 ± 0.055 mm; p = 0.005 and p = 0.021, respectively) and at 1000 N (0.382 ± 0.053 mm vs. 0.494 ± 0.114 mm and 0.576 ± 0.089 mm; p = 0.005). At 1500 N, Group C continued to exhibit the lowest mean displacement (0.592 ± 0.165 mm) compared with Group A (0.601 ± 0.182 mm) and Group B (0.757 ± 0.218 mm), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.336). No statistically significant difference in load-to-failure was observed among the three constructs (p = 0.875), although a descriptive trend favoured Group C (3260.40 ± 351.76 N), followed by Group B (3178.80 ± 218.88 N) and Group A (3145.80 ± 461.66 N).
conclusionsWe demonstrated that the 2.7 mm distal radius T-oblique LCP was associated with comparatively lower vertical displacement under moderate axial loads (500-1000 N) compared to Groups A and B. All three constructs maintained vertical displacement below the 2 mm failure threshold across the tested loading range, suggesting that each is biomechanically adequate to resist normal physiological loads.
trial registrationThis study used only synthetic tibial bone models and did not involve human participants, human tissue, or animals; therefore, formal ethical approval and informed consent were not required. The protocol was nevertheless reviewed and registered by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine Vajira Hospital, Navamindradhiraj University (COE 031/2022).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.