Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42399723›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Mesh closure of a protruding caesarean scar pregnancy in the 11th week of pregnancy.

Mehmet Vural, Maximillian Rauh, Antigoni Hadjiiona, Tilman Born, Angela Köninger

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehmet VuralDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Regensburg, Clinic St. Hedwig, Steinmetzstrasse 1-3, Regensburg, 93049, Germany. mehmet.vural@ukr.de.
Maximillian RauhDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Regensburg, Clinic St. Hedwig, Steinmetzstrasse 1-3, Regensburg, 93049, Germany.
Antigoni HadjiionaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Regensburg, Clinic St. Hedwig, Steinmetzstrasse 1-3, Regensburg, 93049, Germany.
Tilman BornDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Regensburg, Clinic St. Hedwig, Steinmetzstrasse 1-3, Regensburg, 93049, Germany.
Angela KöningerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Regensburg, Clinic St. Hedwig, Steinmetzstrasse 1-3, Regensburg, 93049, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the case of a 30-year-old woman in the first trimester with a cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) following a previous caesarean section, who wished to preserve the pregnancy. External advice had previously recommended termination, but an individualized, experimental approach was agreed upon. At 11th weeks' gestation, a mesh was placed over the scar dehiscence and secured in position. The uterus was strongly retroflexed, and the placenta prolapsed through the scar. Direct closure of the cranial and caudal myometrium surrounding the protruding placenta was not feasible; the defect measured approximately 4 cm, and the prolapsed placenta was the size of a mandarin. The patient was closely monitored until 32 weeks' gestation, when she presented with lower abdominal pain and mild vaginal bleeding. A hysterectomy was performed at the patient's request, although a focal resection had been offered. This case demonstrates that live birth can be achieved in extreme CSP and suggest that mesh coverage of large cesarean scar defects may represent a novel, pregnancy-preserving therapeutic option.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionCicatrixPregnancy, EctopicSurgical MeshAdultFemaleHumansHysterectomyPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstConservative operationMesh closureScar pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID42399723
PMCPMC13335370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.