ArticleScientific reports2026
Microbial contamination of donor corneas and post-keratoplasty endophthalmitis: a comparison between Japanese and U.S. eye banks using cold storage.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the prevalence and microbial spectrum of positive corneoscleral donor rim cultures and the associated risk factors for post-keratoplasty infection in Japan. We retrospectively included consecutive corneal transplantations performed by a single surgeon between April 2015 and September 2021. Donor corneas were obtained from eye banks in Japan (n = 134) or the United States (n = 365) and preserved using cold storage. Donor corneoscleral rim cultures were obtained during surgery. Culture positivity and microbial profiles were analyzed. Risk factors for contamination were evaluated using logistic regression. Overall, 78 (15.6%) were culture-positive. Domestic grafts had significantly higher microbial contamination rates than overseas grafts (30.6% vs. 10.1%, P < 0.001), whereas fungal contamination rates did not differ between groups (1.5% vs. 1.9%, P = 1.000). In the multivariate analysis, overseas eye bank origin was independently associated with a lower risk of microbial contamination (OR 0.259, 95% CI, 0.139-0.486; P < 0.001). Post-keratoplasty endophthalmitis occurred in three cases (0.6%), all of which were associated with positive fungal cultures. Therefore, fungal pathogens may play a key role in increasing clinically significant postoperative endophthalmitis risk after keratoplasty, highlighting the importance of targeted donor tissue screening and postoperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.