Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42399703›Full record

ArticleNature food2026

Reduced meat and dairy consumption improves health, environmental and most nutritional outcomes without increasing diet costs among Scottish adults.

Joe Kennedy, Michael Clark, Cristina Stewart, Ricki Runions, Alexander Vonderschmidt, Sarah M Frank, Peter Scarborough, Fiona Comrie, Alana McDonald, Geraldine McNeill and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joe KennedyDivision of Global Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK. jkenned5@exseed.ed.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5211-7250
Michael ClarkSmith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7161-7751
Cristina StewartDivision of Global Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3060-5874
Ricki RunionsDivision of Global Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Alexander VonderschmidtDivision of Global Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8441-6632
Sarah M FrankDivision of Global Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.
Peter ScarboroughNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2378-2944
Fiona ComrieFood Standards Scotland, Aberdeen, UK.
Alana McDonaldFood Standards Scotland, Aberdeen, UK.
Geraldine McNeillDivision of Global Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0373-650X
Peter AlexanderDivision of Global Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6010-1186
Lindsay M JaacksDivision of Global Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7791-5167

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 227154/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shifting diets away from high levels of meat and dairy is increasingly considered an important part of climate mitigation, yet the best pathways for achieving these reductions without compromising nutrition, health or affordability remain unclear. Here, in a representative sample of Scottish adults, we evaluate 33 pathways to meeting the UK Climate Change Committee's recommendations to reduce meat and dairy consumption by 20% by 2030, increasing to a 35% reduction in meat by 2050. The pathways incorporate existing dietary guidance, and modelled outcomes include intakes of 54 nutrients, obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, diet costs, greenhouse gas emissions, freshwater use, land use and eutrophication. Nearly all pathways were estimated to benefit most nutritional, health and environmental outcomes without increasing diet costs. Benefits were greater when reductions targeted high consumers of red meat and when meat and dairy were replaced gram for gram with foods such as vegetables, beans, eggs and plant-based dairy alternatives.

Indexed as

Dairy ProductsDietMeatAdultAnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesClimate ChangeDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansObesityScotland

Identifiers

PMID42399703
PMCPMC13388101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.