Trial reportActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2026
Impact of Higher Versus Lower Blood Pressure Targets on Pulmonary Vascular Hemodynamics During Intensive Care After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Trial report in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03141099 (Blood Pressure and Oxygenation Targets in Post-resuscitation Care, a Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Blood Pressure and Oxygenation Targets in Post-resuscitation Care, a Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemodynamic management after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is critical, yet the impact of vasopressor-driven mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets on pulmonary circulation and right ventricular (RV) function remains unclear.
methodsIn this substudy of the randomized, double-blinded BOX trial, comatose OHCA survivors were allocated to low (63 mmHg) or high (77 mmHg) MAP targets. Pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) were used for serial hemodynamic assessment for 48 h after Intensive Care Unit admission. The primary endpoint was calculated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), secondary endpoints included pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), and RV cardiac power output (RV-CPO)-a measurement of RV pumping function.
resultsAmong 730 included patients (median time randomization to PAC insertion 1.3 h), mPAP was consistently higher in the high-MAP group (mean difference 1.11-1.71 mmHg, 95% CI range 0.12-2.59). Calculated PVR was transiently lower in the high-MAP group during the first 24 h (mean difference -0.16 to -0.30, 95% CI range -0.31 to 0.11), before converging between groups. RV-CPO was lower in the low-MAP group throughout the observation period (mean difference 0.01-0.04 W [95% range 0.00-0.07], with the largest difference at 48 h. PCWP decreased in both groups but was significantly lower in the low-MAP group during the first 12 h (mean difference 1.06-1.40 mmHg, 95% CI range 0.25-2.38).
conclusionsIn comatose OHCA survivors, targeting a higher MAP increased pulmonary artery pressures, PCWP, RV-CPO, heart rate, and cardiac output. The proportionally greater increase in cardiac output over pulmonary artery pressures resulted in a decreased calculated PVR.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03141099. EDITORIAL COMMENT: In this secondary analysis of a subgroup in the BOX out of hospital cardiac arrest treatment trial for oxygen level targets, blood pressure treatment target levels, higher or lower were analyzed, including central circulatory outcomes, using a pulmonary artery catheter. The higher blood pressure target group had accompanying higher pulmonary artery pressures and cardiac output, with initially a small reduction in calculated pulmonary vascular resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.