ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2026
The chemokine receptor-like fourth extracellular loop of the apelin receptor differentially regulates apelin and elabela binding and signalling.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeApelin and Elabela are endogenous ligands of the apelin receptor (apelin receptor/APJ), a GPCR involved in cardiovascular regulation and body fluid homeostasis. The human receptor contains a conserved disulfide bridge linking the N-terminal domain to extracellular loop 3 (ECL3) via Cys19 and Cys281, forming a structural constraint analogous to a fourth extracellular loop ('ECL4'). In the chemokine receptor family, this motif plays a critical role in ligand engagement and receptor activation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The functional role of this disulfide bridge was investigated using site-directed mutagenesis (Cys19Ala and Cys281Ala), plasmon waveguide resonance binding assays and BRET-based biosensors to monitor Gαi activation and β-arrestin-2 recruitment. KEY
resultsDisruption of the disulfide bridge did not affect receptor surface expression but markedly impaired binding of apelin fragments (pE13F and K17F), leading to reduced Gαi signalling and β-arrestin-2 recruitment. In contrast, binding of the Elabela fragment K22P and the subsequent apelin receptor signalling activation were largely preserved. Antagonist antibodies (JN241 and JN241-Fc) retained activity, whereas the agonist antibody JN241-9-Fc showed strongly reduced efficacy for the mutated receptors. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The N-terminal/ECL3 disulfide bridge is a critical structural determinant for apelin binding and apelin receptor activation but is less critical for Elabela signalling, supporting distinct modes of ligand engagement. Antibody-mediated agonism is particularly sensitive to alterations of « ECL4 » without affecting its binding, suggesting that this structural constraint is required for optimal apelin receptor activation. The apelin receptor shares functional similarities with the chemokine receptors with respect to this.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.