Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42399569›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2026

The chemokine receptor-like fourth extracellular loop of the apelin receptor differentially regulates apelin and elabela binding and signalling.

Chloé Bonef, Hela Bouhsine, Carine Huynh, Marion Chaigneau, Steven Dubois, Mikel Garcia-Marcos, Catherine Llorens-Cortes, Denis Servent, Philippe Robin, Hervé Nozach and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chloé BonefUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire pour la Santé (SIMoS), EMR CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Hela BouhsineLaboratory of Central Neuropeptides in the Regulation of Water Balance and Cardiovascular Functions, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Biology, INSERM U1050, CNRS UMR 7241, Collège de France, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Carine HuynhUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire pour la Santé (SIMoS), EMR CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Marion ChaigneauUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire pour la Santé (SIMoS), EMR CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Steven DuboisUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire pour la Santé (SIMoS), Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Mikel Garcia-MarcosDepartment of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Catherine Llorens-CortesUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire pour la Santé (SIMoS), EMR CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Denis ServentUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire pour la Santé (SIMoS), EMR CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Philippe RobinUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire pour la Santé (SIMoS), EMR CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Hervé NozachUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire pour la Santé (SIMoS), Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Isabel AlvesUniversité de Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, CBMN, UMR 5248, Pessac, France.
Xavier IturriozUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), Service d'Ingénierie Moléculaire pour la Santé (SIMoS), EMR CNRS, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7143-8323

Funding

Addressing the complexity and plasticity of heterotrimeric G protein signalingR35GM156286 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Mikel Garcia-Marcos · 2025 to 2026
$1.4M
Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-23-CE14-0027-01Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives PTC3PEGPCRDINIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM156286NIH HHS R35GM156286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeApelin and Elabela are endogenous ligands of the apelin receptor (apelin receptor/APJ), a GPCR involved in cardiovascular regulation and body fluid homeostasis. The human receptor contains a conserved disulfide bridge linking the N-terminal domain to extracellular loop 3 (ECL3) via Cys19 and Cys281, forming a structural constraint analogous to a fourth extracellular loop ('ECL4'). In the chemokine receptor family, this motif plays a critical role in ligand engagement and receptor activation. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The functional role of this disulfide bridge was investigated using site-directed mutagenesis (Cys19Ala and Cys281Ala), plasmon waveguide resonance binding assays and BRET-based biosensors to monitor Gαi activation and β-arrestin-2 recruitment. KEY

resultsDisruption of the disulfide bridge did not affect receptor surface expression but markedly impaired binding of apelin fragments (pE13F and K17F), leading to reduced Gαi signalling and β-arrestin-2 recruitment. In contrast, binding of the Elabela fragment K22P and the subsequent apelin receptor signalling activation were largely preserved. Antagonist antibodies (JN241 and JN241-Fc) retained activity, whereas the agonist antibody JN241-9-Fc showed strongly reduced efficacy for the mutated receptors. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The N-terminal/ECL3 disulfide bridge is a critical structural determinant for apelin binding and apelin receptor activation but is less critical for Elabela signalling, supporting distinct modes of ligand engagement. Antibody-mediated agonism is particularly sensitive to alterations of « ECL4 » without affecting its binding, suggesting that this structural constraint is required for optimal apelin receptor activation. The apelin receptor shares functional similarities with the chemokine receptors with respect to this.

Indexed as

ApelinApelin ReceptorsPeptide HormonesAnimalsHEK293 CellsHumansMutagenesis, Site-DirectedProtein BindingSignal TransductionAPELA protein, humanApelinApelin ReceptorsAPLN protein, humanAPLNR protein, humanPeptide HormonesapelinAPJelabelaG protein‐coupled receptorsite‐directed mutagenesis

Identifiers

PMID42399569
PMCPMC13682678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.