ReviewJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)2026
Beyond the target: implications of Wnt pathway inhibitors on bone health.
Review in Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wnt signaling inhibitors are under investigation as potential therapies for conditions characterized by upregulated Wnt signaling, such as cancers, hematological disorders, and organ fibrosis. However, because the Wnt pathway is essential for bone homeostasis, its inhibition can adversely affect skeletal health. This review focuses on the bone-related off-target effects of Wnt inhibitors currently in clinical development, specifically those evaluated in Phase I and II trials with available published data. We found that inhibitors targeting upstream components of the pathway-such as Wnt ligands or receptors (e.g., porcupine inhibitors, Ipafricept, or Vantictumab)-frequently lead to bone-related adverse effects, including fractures and early trial termination. Co-administration of bisphosphonates may help mitigate these effects. In contrast, downstream inhibitors (e.g., PRI-724, niclosamide) have not been linked to bone toxicity, although this may reflect either underreporting or a genuinely lower skeletal impact. Further preclinical studies are warranted to better understand these differential effects. A thorough understanding of bone-specific risks is critical as Wnt signaling inhibitors continue to advance in clinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.