ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Deep Learning-Based Panoramic Radiograph Retrieval from Antemortem Images for Forensic Identification.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of an expert-assisted, semi-automated, Convolutional Neural Network based deep learning framework developed using panoramic dental radiographs in large-scale retrieval-based forensic identification scenarios. During the model development process, 2,440 panoramic radiographs from 842 individuals were preprocessed through masking, intensity based cropping of the region of interest, and resizing. Positive pairs were generated from images belonging to the same individual, whereas negative pairs were generated from images belonging to different individuals, and class balance was maintained. Model performance was evaluated using subject level 5-fold cross validation with four different deep learning backbones, thereby preventing images from the same individual from being shared between the training and validation sets. The results showed that the best individual performance was achieved with the ConvNeXt-Tiny model. Top-1, Top-3, and Top-5 accuracy values obtained with the ConvNeXt-Tiny model were 75.00 ± 6.51, 82.22 ± 3.16, and 83.33 ± 1.96, respectively. These findings indicate that the proposed method is effective and applicable in forensic identification practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42399502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.