ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrating DNA methylation biomarkers for breast cancer risk prediction using artificial intelligence.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among women worldwide, highlighting the necessity for predictive tools to identify at-risk individuals prior to the manifestation of symptoms. Standard imaging, like mammography, has limited sensitivity in dense breasts and relies on visible morphological changes. In contrast, circulating DNA methylation biomarkers provide a minimally invasive, stable alternative that detects systemic epigenetic changes before tumors develop. This study analyzes DNA methylation profiles from the GSE51032 EPIC-Italy cohort (Illumina HumanMethylation450K platform), involving 845 participants, including only 658 cancer-free and breast cancer samples. After quality control (QC), 224 pre-diagnostic breast cancer cases and 418 controls are included, totaling 642 samples across 483,848 CpG sites. Differential methylation analysis identifies 4621 CpG sites with significant methylation differences (FDR < 0.1, |Δβ| >= 0.03). These features are subsequently utilized to train and evaluate a variety of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) classifiers. Among these, the random forest demonstrated the highest overall performance, attaining an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.849 and an accuracy of 0.798. These findings highlight the potential of integrating high-dimensional epigenomic biomarkers with artificial intelligence (AI) to enable early prediction of breast cancer risk, thereby promoting minimally invasive screening and personalized prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.