ArticleScientific reports2026
Distinct positive and negative dimensions of psychotherapy treatment expectations across three independent samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment expectations are central to psychotherapy outcomes but are typically assessed as a unidimensional construct focusing on anticipated improvement. This study investigated whether expectations of improvement, worsening, and side effects, as measured by the Generic Rating Scale for Previous Treatment Experiences, Treatment Expectations, and Treatment Effects (GEEE), represent distinct dimensions in psychotherapy. We examined three samples differing in treatment context and symptom burden: patients currently in psychotherapy (N = 102), prescreened patients awaiting psychotherapy (N = 83), and a community sample of former psychotherapy patients who reported current mental health problems (N = 219). Across all groups, expectations of improvement were distinct from expectations of worsening and side effects, whereas the latter two showed moderate overlap. Improvement expectations correlated strongly with the Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ), while worsening and side effect expectations did not, indicating discriminant validity. In the psychotherapy sample, depressive symptoms were negatively associated with improvement expectations and positively with worsening and side effect expectations. The findings support the GEEE as a brief and multidimensional tool that extends beyond existing measures by capturing both positive and negative facets of treatment expectations. Differentiating these domains may help identify patients at risk of disengagement and inform tailored interventions to foster more adaptive expectation profiles in psychotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.