ReviewPest management science2026
Delivery strategies for entomopathogenic fungi in crop pest management: a review.
Review in Pest management science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Entomopathogenic fungi (EPF) are promising biocontrol agents for sustainable crop protection, but their field performance remains inconsistent. Their successful implementation depends not only on the virulence of the EPF strain and its tolerance to abiotic stress, but also on effective delivery of viable inoculum to susceptible pest stages under operationally feasible conditions. This review analyses the main EPF delivery strategies and identifies their strengths and limitations. The evidence demonstrates that: (1) delivery strategy strongly influences EPF efficacy and post-application persistence by determining inoculum placement, protection and likelihood of contact with the target pest; (2) strategies such as bands, lure-based systems and living vectors can exploit predictable pest behavior to improve inoculum targeting, but are generally limited by labor, the need for tailored system design and greater operational requirements; (3) granular applications and irrigation-based delivery can place EPF in soil-associated pest habitats and partially protect inoculum from unfavorable environmental factors, although pathogen performance depends on formulation and soil conditions; (4) endophytic delivery offers alternative routes for potentially prolonged pest exposure, but currently requires further field validation and operational development; and (5) spray application remains the most scalable and broadly implemented strategy, although EPF are exposed to abiotic stressors and their efficacy depends on optimizing equipment configuration to ensure propagule viability during application, suspension stability, and conidial distribution. Overall, this review highlights that delivery strategy selection should not rely on a single factor, but rather on the integration of pest traits, agroecosystem conditions, and application constraints. The most effective fungal biocontrol programs are likely to combine complementary strategies to maximize their performance. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.