ArticleBMJ open2026
Quebec lung, liver and heart transplant recipients' perspectives on self-narratives and their experiences in creative writing workshops during the transplantation journey: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough solid organ transplantation is a life-saving procedure, it is also associated with numerous challenges for patients. Creative writing has been described as a therapeutic tool for patients with chronic disease. Between 2020 and 2022, we held creative writing workshops with patients and professional writers. During these workshops, patients were invited to explore different aspects of their transplantation journey through different literary styles.
objectivesThe aim of this study is to understand lung, liver and heart transplant patients' perspectives on the role of patient self-narratives and creative writing workshops during their transplantation journey, and collect testimonies on their experiences in the workshops.
designFocus groups and individual interviews.
settingThe Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) lung and liver transplant programmes and the Montreal Heart Institute (MHI) heart transplant programme.
participantsLung, liver and heart transplant recipients attending the CHUM and the MHI transplant clinic between September 2020 and August 2022.
methodsBefore the creative writing workshop, we conducted two focus groups and individual interviews with 22 lung recipients, five liver transplant recipients and four heart transplant patients. After their participation in the creative workshop, we conducted 17 semi-structured interviews with nine lung transplant recipients, four liver transplant recipients and one heart transplant recipient (three participants participated twice in interviews). Interviews were transcribed for subsequent qualitative description analyses.
resultsMost participants had previous experiences of sharing their transplant stories and considered that a web-based platform where transplant patients share their stories could be highly beneficial for future transplant patients and the public. The creative workshops were described as 'therapeutic' since they let participants express their emotions and realities. Peer support and connection to other people contributed to normalise their transplant journey and helped participants put their experiences into perspective.
conclusionsCreative writing workshops and peer support through the sharing of self-narratives are a feasible approach that participants have described as beneficial. Future studies are needed to assess the benefits of patients' creative writings on other patients and on caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.