SynthesisBMJ paediatrics open2026
Impact of mode of birth and perinatal antibiotics on infant gut microbiota and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate how the mode of birth and perinatal antibiotic exposure, independently and together, influence infant gut-microbiota composition, diversity and early health outcomes.
designSystematic review and meta-analysis conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 and prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024536785). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to October 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials, cohort or case-control studies of healthy term infants comparing vaginal versus caesarean birth and/or perinatal antibiotic exposure, with microbiota analysed by sequencing within 12 months post-delivery.
resultsEleven studies (n=5309 infants) were included, comprising ten prospective cohort studies and one randomised controlled trial across Europe, North America, Africa and Asia. Synthesis of six studies showed no statistically significant difference in bacterial abundance between vaginally delivered and caesarean-born infants (mean difference 3.44%, 95% CI -2.00 to 8.89; I² = 99%; very low certainty). Among antibiotic-exposed infants, the mean difference was -0.31% (95% CI -3.52 to 2.89), while among antibiotic-unexposed infants an exploratory trend towards higher bacterial abundance following vaginal delivery was observed. Narrative synthesis indicated consistent reductions in microbial diversity and depletion of Bacteroides and Bifidobacterium following caesarean birth or perinatal antibiotic exposure. Overall, caesarean delivery and perinatal antibiotic exposure were associated with differences in gut microbiota composition and diversity. Exclusive breastfeeding emerged as a modifying factor associated with partial restoration of microbial balance.
conclusionsThis review, the first to integrate both delivery mode and perinatal antibiotic exposure within a single analysis, suggests a consistent directional pattern of association between these exposures and early microbial assembly, with exclusive breastfeeding mitigating some potential negative effects. Due to imprecision in estimates and inherent limitations of observational data, pooled differences were not statistically significant, and overall certainty of evidence was very low. Long-term clinical consequences remain uncertain, highlighting the need for further study. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024536785.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.