ArticleAcademic pediatrics
Male Youth Perspectives on a Pre-Visit Mobile Health App for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Care.
Article in Academic pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAdolescent males have distinct sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs yet remain underrepresented in primary care SRH interventions. This qualitative study explored male adolescents' preferences and perceptions regarding the design of a pre-visit mobile health (mHealth) app to enhance SRH knowledge and care engagement.
methodsWe conducted three rounds of focus groups with 26 male youth aged 15-21 from diverse backgrounds. Using thematic analysis, we identified themes related to participants' SRH knowledge and skills gaps, care engagement, and perceptions of an SRH app for male youth.
resultsParticipants were mostly cisgender (92%), non-Hispanic Black/African American (50%), and heterosexual (69%). Three themes emerged: 1) Systemic and social influences on SRH knowledge, behaviors, and care-seeking; 2) Perceived value of a male-tailored SRH app; 3) Preferences for an engaging and interactive app design. Participants traced SRH knowledge gaps to inadequate SRH education and described low self-efficacy for partner communication and accessing condoms. They identified barriers to clinical communication including confidentiality concerns and limited access to affordable services. Many expressed enthusiasm for a male-tailored SRH app to facilitate care engagement while also acknowledging concerns about sustained digital engagement.
conclusionsParticipants emphasized their desire for comprehensive, accurate, and tailored SRH information delivered in engaging digital formats. They saw strong potential for an app to boost their confidence in navigating SRH behaviors and conversations with clinicians and partners. Findings will inform the development of a pre-visit SRH app for males that will be piloted in youth-serving primary care settings and assessed for effectiveness across diverse adolescent populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.