ArticleNurse education in practice2026
A structured pipeline for building nursing research capacity through experiential and mentored research engagement.
Article in Nurse education in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo critically examine and advance a structured, mentored approach for integrating nursing students into active research programs to support research capacity development.
backgroundIntegrating undergraduate and graduate nursing students into research is essential for developing future nurse researchers and advancing science. Few papers describe how to engage and support student participation in funded and non-funded research programs.
designDiscursive paper.
methodsThis paper critically engages with literature on research capacity building, experiential learning and participatory research approaches. Drawing on an applied research context within a teaching-focused academic setting and an ongoing instrument development project, a structured mentoring approach is examined as a means of addressing gaps in traditional research education.
resultsEmbedding students within active research programs in this context provided insights into how structured mentorship and experiential learning support the development of research competencies and emerging scholarly identity. Engagement across multiple phases of the research process highlighted opportunities for skill development in research design, ethics, data management and dissemination. DISCUSSION: A structured research integration approach is proposed as a transferable model to bridge the gap between theoretical learning and applied research practice. Integrating students into all aspects of research supports a culture of scientific inquiry. This applied model provides a transferable approach for nursing faculty to expand student engagement and strengthen scholarly capacity within teaching-focused environments.
conclusionThis paper advances a structured and practice integrated approach to research capacity development, offering a scalable strategy for strengthening nursing research engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.