Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42398080›Full record

ReviewBritish medical bulletin2026

Regional musculoskeletal pain in workers-is the traditional medical model increasing disability?

Karen Walker-Bone, Rachelle Buchbinder

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British medical bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Karen Walker-BoneMonash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health Research, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5992-1459
Rachelle BuchbinderDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0597-0933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMusculoskeletal disorders frequently cause work disability. For low back pain, a de-medicalized approach is advocated, whereas a biomedical approach is taken for shoulder and elbow/forearm pain. SOURCES OF DATA: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: Guidelines for the management of low back pain recommend de-medicalization, rapid mobilization, avoidance of imaging, second-line use of pharmacological treatments, and an emphasis on self-management and remaining in or rapidly returning to work. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Despite evidence for many treatment modalities, shoulder pain and elbow/forearm pain are still managed using a biomedical model that separates conditions into distinct diseases and treats them accordingly. GROWING POINTS: Should pain at the shoulder and elbow/forearm be de-medicalized, with greater emphasis on maintaining mobility and work participation? AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Testing integrated occupational and health interventions for musculoskeletal disorders, focusing on their effectiveness in work rehabilitation and reducing disability.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal PainOccupational DiseasesDisability EvaluationHumansLow Back Painback painelbow/forearm painmusculoskeletal disordersmusculoskeletal painnon-specific arm painsickness absencework participation

Identifiers

PMID42398080
PMCPMC13331447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.