Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42398072›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2026

A historical journey of metabolite-protein interaction discovery: from data harmonization to AI-driven prediction.

Toby Lawrence, Ema Mocsonokyova, Adwait Mahesh Barde, Dezso Modos, Marc-Emmanuel Dumas, Tamas Korcsmaros, Lejla Gul

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Toby LawrenceDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Ema MocsonokyovaDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Adwait Mahesh BardeDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Dezso ModosDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Marc-Emmanuel DumasDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.
Tamas KorcsmarosDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1717-996X
Lejla GulDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College London, Du Cane Rd, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0009-6463-6079

Funding

French National Agency for Research ANR-18-IBHU-0001French National Research Agency ANR-10-LABX-46French National Research Agency ANR-25-CE14-1815-01Hauts-de-France Regional Council 20001891/NP0025517Imperial-CNRS Joint PhD programmeImperial College Research FellowshipNational Center for Precision Diabetic Medicine-PreciDIABNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre Organoid FacilityUK Medical Research Council MR/M501797/1UK Medical Research Council MR/W022532/1UK Medical Research Council MR/X010155/1UKRI BBSRC BB/Y512540/1UKRI BBSRC Institute Strategic Program Food Microbiome and Health BBS/E/F/000PR13631UKRI BBSRC Institute Strategic Program Food Microbiome and Health BB/X011054/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolites are life-sustaining small molecules produced by living organisms. They interact with proteins involved in metabolism, signalling, and gene regulation, called metabolite-protein interactions (MPIs). This review traces the history of MPI research, from curated resources and early cheminformatics to harmonized identifiers, proteome-scale structural models, and artificial intelligence-driven prediction, while highlighting persistent challenges that continue to limit mechanistic interpretation of metabolomics. Early small-molecule-protein interaction prediction tools (e.g. Molpat and Catalyst) and resources (e.g. ChEMBL and BindingDB) were typically biased towards drug-like molecules. As drug-centred research continued, a revolution in large-scale metabolomics enabled high-throughput profiling of metabolite levels across physiological and disease states. However, these advances also introduced major data integration challenges such as data fragmentation, unresolved metabolite identities, and limited physiological context. Subsequent metabolite-centric resources (e.g. HMDB) and high-throughput screens applied to MPI detection (e.g. thermal proteome profiling) have partially addressed this bias. Proteome-scale structure prediction (e.g. AlphaFold) has further incentivized research into the effects of metabolites on protein structure and function. Nevertheless, the complexity of the biological response also depends on, e.g. exposure, access, and target expression. Looking ahead, MPI research is likely to be shaped by structure-aware deep learning and the integration of MPIs with comprehensive single-cell multi-omics data and host-microbe modelling. These advances may turn metabolomic signals into causal, testable hypotheses, enabling robust systems-level MPI maps for identifying intervention points and designing new treatments. We propose a historically structured roadmap centred on standards-driven data integration and calibrated, structure-aware modelling to support mechanistic, systems-level MPI maps.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMetabolomicsProteinsHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansProteomeProteinsProteomecheminformaticsmetabolite–protein interactionsmetabolomicsmulti-omics integration

Identifiers

PMID42398072
PMCPMC13331449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.