Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42398068›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

DNA-DETR: sequence representation matters in object detection for functional genomic elements.

Bing-Shiun Tsai, Jin-Yung Wong, Huai-Kuang Tsai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bing-Shiun TsaiInstitute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Jin-Yung WongInstitute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.
Huai-Kuang TsaiInstitute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4200-8137

Funding

Institute of Information Science, Academia SinicaNational Science and Technology Council 110-2221-E-001-013-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Object detection has revolutionized multiple domains by enabling models to jointly classify and localize targets within data. Yet, its potential in genomic sequence analysis remains largely unexplored. Here, we introduce DNA-DETR, an adaptation of the DETR architecture for one-dimensional genomic object detection. Surprisingly, the direct application of object detection to DNA sequences yielded poor performance, even for elements with simple definitions such as Non-B DNA. We found that the widely used one-hot encoding failed to capture key structural features of several Non-B DNA types. To address this limitation, we systematically investigated how different sequence representations, including one-hot encoding, dot matrix, and their combination, affect detection accuracy and model generalization. Our experiments demonstrate that the choice of representation profoundly affects both localization and classification. Notably, the combined representation consistently outperformed single representations, particularly for complex sequence elements. Our findings suggest that there is no universal 'one-representation-fits-all' solution in sequence feature learning. Despite the common perception that end-to-end learning diminishes the importance of representation, our results highlight that thoughtful selection of sequence representation remains critical for model design.

Indexed as

DNAGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNAAlgorithmsDetection AlgorithmsDNADETRfunctional genomic elementsobject detectionsequence representationtransformer

Identifiers

PMID42398068
PMCPMC13331352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.