Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42398033›Full record

SynthesisJMIR dermatology2026

The Rise in Homemade Sunscreen Trends and Future Impacts on Skin Cancer Risk: Systematic Review.

Gabi Kaftan, Mia Panillo, Lydia Maxon, Emily Esposito

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gabi KaftanCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Sullivan University, 2100 Gardiner Ln, Louisville, KY, 40205, United States, 1 5024138640.ORCID 0009-0004-7443-0481
Mia PanilloCollege of Osteopathic Medicine, Rocky Vista University, Englewood, CO, United States.ORCID 0009-0004-1518-3548
Lydia MaxonSt. Olaf College, Northfield, MN, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-0699-7284
Emily EspositoCollege of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Sullivan University, 2100 Gardiner Ln, Louisville, KY, 40205, United States, 1 5024138640.ORCID 0000-0002-2357-6972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The trend of homemade sunscreen recipes has rapidly gained popularity over the last decade, being largely fueled by social media influencers, natural health blogs, and the growing mistrust of large health organizations like the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Consumers are increasingly drawn to products labeled "natural," "organic," "vegan," and "cruelty-free," often conflating these terms with safety and effectiveness. However, when applied to sun protection, these assumptions can be dangerously misleading. According to the FDA, there is no verified mathematical formula that can be used to determine an accurate sun protection factor (SPF) rating for the amount of zinc oxide used in many of the recipes found online. Objective: The objective of this review is to examine the rising popularity and efficacy of homemade sunscreens compared to commercial sunscreens and highlight the potential public health implications of skin cancer risk related to homemade sunscreen use. Methods: Multiple databases were searched to find current and relevant literature analyzing the social media impact relating to homemade sunscreens and the efficacy of homemade sunscreens compared to commercially available products. Digital content that included or discussed homemade sunscreen recipes was included as well to provide examples of information trending online. Results: One study analyzing social media trends found that many strong, unverified claims relating to homemade sunscreen versus commercial sunscreen use are being presented in the media, potentially influencing public knowledge. Additional studies analyzing the components of homemade sunscreen recipes compared to components in commercially available products found that homemade sunscreens offer little to no sun protection, therefore increasing the risk of UV damage for individuals using homemade products. Conclusions: Based on the presented evidence, the adoption of unregulated homemade sunscreens presents a substantial threat to public health. Misinformation spread through social media and influencer culture may unintentionally contribute to an increase in UV-related skin cancers. Greater efforts are needed from health care professionals, regulatory bodies, and online platforms to educate the public and promote the use of scientifically validated sun protection methods.

Indexed as

Skin NeoplasmsSunscreening AgentsHumansSocial MediaSun Protection FactorSunscreening Agentscommercialhomemadesocial mediaSPFsun protectionsunscreenultravioletultraviolet radiationUV

Identifiers

PMID42398033
PMCPMC13331330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.