Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42398029›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

In vivo methane abatement by pyromellitic diimide in sheep and redirection of rumen hydrogen by co-administered feed additives.

Mohammed Rashed Chowdhury, Thomas C Williams, Dominik Kopp, Joe Bracegirdle, Alex Carpenter, Frances C Cowley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohammed Rashed ChowdhurySchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2012-7784
Thomas C WilliamsNumber 8 Bio Pty Ltd, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Dominik KoppNumber 8 Bio Pty Ltd, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Joe BracegirdleNumber 8 Bio Pty Ltd, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Alex CarpenterNumber 8 Bio Pty Ltd, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia.
Frances C CowleySchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6475-1503

Funding

Number 8 Bio Pty Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyromellitic diimide (PD) has been shown to reduce enteric CH4 emissions in vitro, but no research has yet quantified CH4 reduction potential of PD in vivo. It is proposed that a combination of CH4 inhibitors, such as PD, rhubarb extract (RE), or monensin (MO), and hydrogen acceptors, such as fumaric acid (FA), could improve the mitigation of CH4 and direct hydrogen to other sinks. This study is the first to assess the combined effects of PD, RE, MO, and FA on intake, ruminal fermentation, and CH4 emissions in sheep. Forty-eight Merino-cross sheep were housed in individual pens and allocated to eight dietary treatments in a complete block design, for a 35-d feeding period. Experimental diets were based on alfalfa pellet mixed with 1.0% canola-oil, alone (Control) or with addition of 50 mg/kg DM of PD, 250 mg/kg DM of RE, 30 mg/kg DM of MO, or 2,000 mg/kg DM of FA, and the combined mixtures of PD + RE, PD + RE + FA or PD + RE + FA + MO. Enteric CH4 emissions were measured weekly for 5 wk. The additives did not alter DMI, average daily gain, feed efficiency, or body condition score. Supplementation of PD reduced (P < 0.01) CH4 production, yield, and intensity by 74% to 79% compared with Control (P < 0.01), but no further improvement in CH4 reduction was observed when PD was combined with other additives. Dissolved CH4 in rumen fluid was reduced and dissolved H2 was increased 8-fold by PD alone (P < 0.01). When RE was added alongside PD (either alone or in combination with FA or MO), dissolved H2 remained elevated above Control levels, but was approximately half that observed with PD alone, suggesting that RE, FA, and MO facilitated the redirection of hydrogen toward alternative fermentation pathways. The combination of PD + RE increased (P < 0.01) butyrate concentration by 1.34-fold, compared with Control, while the combined supplementation of all additives (PD + RE + FA + MO) increased (P < 0.01) the molar proportion of propionate (by 1.34-fold) and deceased the proportions of acetate (by 0.92-fold) and the acetate-to-propionate ratio (by 0.39-fold) compared with Control. In conclusion, supplementation of PD alone or combined with RE, RE + FA, or RE + MO + FA can reduce CH4 emissions, and when combined with rhubarb extract, can redirect hydrogen to other sinks in sheep without compromising intake or performance.

Indexed as

HydrogenMethaneRumenAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsFermentationFumaratesMaleMonensinSheepFumaratesHydrogenMethaneMonensincombinationfermentationhydrogen sinkmethanogenesisperformancestacking

Identifiers

PMID42398029
PMCPMC13528773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.