ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
TEDLH: domain HMMs for sensitive detection of remote homologues.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe Encyclopedia of Domains (TED) provides domain annotations for proteins in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database (AFDB) using a consensus of three state-of-the-art structure-based methods. We used these annotations to construct profile Hidden Markov models (HMMs), collectively forming the TED Library of HMMs (TEDLH). TEDLH enables sensitive sequence and profile searches, supporting systematic exploration of protein domain families and their evolutionary relationships.
resultsTEDLH links 934,186 domain HMMs to experimentally determined CATH-PDB structures through direct (primary) and transitive (secondary and tertiary) relationships. Fewer than half of TEDLH HMMs are directly linked to a CATH-PDB domain; the remaining models are connected through transitive relationships. These transitive links extend coverage into more divergent regions of sequence space and better represent CATH superfamily diversity. HMM-HMM comparisons within CATH superfamily 3.30.70.100 illustrate how transitive relationships expand sequence coverage. In this superfamily, 5640 TEDLH HMMs are connected to 173 CATH-PDB representatives. Primary, secondary, and tertiary relationships progressively capture more divergent sequences (pairwise sequence identity <20%) that retain structural similarity (TM-score ≥0.6) and a conserved two-layer α/β sandwich core fold. All-against-all HMM-HMM comparisons across TEDLH also reveal sequence similarities across the CATH hierarchy (cross-hits). At low query coverage (<50%), cross-hits are more frequent between CATH classes, architectures and topologies, whereas at higher coverage thresholds (≥70%) they predominantly occur between superfamilies. These cross-hits are not driven by superfamily size or sequence diversity and can provide guidance for CATH curation. As an example, analysis of cross-hits between superfamilies 2.170.130.30 and 3.10.20.30 reveals evolutionary relationships between these groups. AVAILABILITY: TEDLH is compatible with HH-suite3 and is available from FigShare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28531754 for local use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.