ArticleArhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju2026
Glyphosate internal dose estimation: comparing passive dosimetry and biomonitoring in simulated heavy residential herbicide application.
Article in Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glyphosate exposure is commonly assessed using either passive dosimetry or biomonitoring. This study tests the hypothesis that internal dose estimates derived from passive dosimetry are higher and more uncertain than those derived from biomonitoring by comparing concurrently collected passive dosimetry and biomonitoring data from a controlled simulation of heavy residential herbicide application. The two predominant exposure routes were evaluated separately: six applicators were protected from dermal exposures with hooded Tyvek
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.