In one paragraphArticle in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
26 authors.
Adam B RohrlachDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4204-5018 Lyazzat MusralinaCenter of Paleogenetics and Ethnogenomics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-8591-890X Guido Gnecchi-RusconeDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6490-8101 Taylor HermesDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-468X Elmira KhussainovaCenter of Paleogenetics and Ethnogenomics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0001-9072-187X Nurzhibek KahbatkyzyCenter of Paleogenetics and Ethnogenomics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.
Bakhytzhan BekmanovLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2232-0481 Olzhas IksanLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2960-695X Nazym AltynovaLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0003-3239-2822 Jonathan TukeSchool of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1688-8951 Matthew RoughanSchool of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7882-7329 Baurzhan BaitanayevA. Kh. Margulan Institute of Archaeology, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Abdesh Toleubayev
Rinat ZhumatayevDepartment of Archaeology, Ethnology and Museology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-2291-4992 Bakkeldi RysbekDepartment of Archaeology, Ethnology and Museology, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0009-0004-7632-8245 Choongwon JeongSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3049-2352 Wolfgang HaakDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2475-2007 Leyla DjansugurovaCenter of Paleogenetics and Ethnogenomics, Institute of Genetics and Physiology, Almaty 050060, Kazakhstan.ORCID 0000-0002-6745-9903 Johannes KrauseDepartment of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9144-3920 Ainash ChildebayevaDepartment of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3144-6481 Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
The Eurasian Steppe in the first millennium BCE saw the rise of the Scytho-Siberian archaeological horizon, which would come to stretch from the Altai Mountains in the east to the Black Sea in the west. We examined the genetic profiles of Iron Age Scythians to explore how social status shaped biological relatedness and ancestry patterns. We present genome-wide data from 85 individuals (38 elite and 47 non-elite), including 45 newly sequenced individuals and the first genome-wide data for the Scythian "Golden Man." We identify consanguineous unions, a reduced effective population size, and identity-by-descent links among the elites. Dynastic rule is supported by elite grandparent-grandchild relationships across cemeteries. While ancestries are heterogeneous, elite Iron Age Scythians show lower variation and no detectable patrilocal or matrilocal signal. These findings highlight hereditary status transmission and the emergence of social stratification in ancient nomadic societies.
Indexed as
DNA, AncientArchaeologyGenetics, PopulationHistory, AncientHumansDNA, Ancient
Identifiers
PMID42397927
PMCPMC13330900
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390