Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42397879›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Functional Independence in Spinal Cord Injury: Protocol for a Predictive Rule Development and Validation Study.

Alberto Isaac Perez-Sanpablo, Marlene Alejandra Rodriguez-Barragan, Alicia Meneses-Peñaloza, Jimena Quinzaños-Fresnedo, Aida Barrera-Ortiz, Fabiola Monserrat Palomino-Ramos, Oscar Prado-Escobar, Marcela D Rodríguez, Irvin Hussein Lopez-Nava, Jose Ambrosio-Bastian

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alberto Isaac Perez-Sanpablo *Motion Analysis and Rehabilitation Engineering Lab, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0550-928X
Marlene Alejandra Rodriguez-Barragan *Neurologic Rehabilitation Division, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico-Xochimilco Av. 289, Mexico City, 14389, Mexico, 52 5559991000 ext 13410.ORCID 0000-0002-3234-4815
Alicia Meneses-Peñaloza *Pediatric Rehabilitation Division, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-4042-6244
Jimena Quinzaños-FresnedoNeurologic Rehabilitation Division, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico-Xochimilco Av. 289, Mexico City, 14389, Mexico, 52 5559991000 ext 13410.ORCID 0000-0002-2780-6878
Aida Barrera-OrtizNeurologic Rehabilitation Division, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico-Xochimilco Av. 289, Mexico City, 14389, Mexico, 52 5559991000 ext 13410.ORCID 0000-0003-4094-1748
Fabiola Monserrat Palomino-RamosNeurologic Rehabilitation Division, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico-Xochimilco Av. 289, Mexico City, 14389, Mexico, 52 5559991000 ext 13410.ORCID 0009-0004-5724-8362
Oscar Prado-EscobarNeurologic Rehabilitation Division, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación, Mexico-Xochimilco Av. 289, Mexico City, 14389, Mexico, 52 5559991000 ext 13410.ORCID 0009-0006-6512-679X
Marcela D RodríguezFaculty of Engineering, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali, Baja California, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-6943-7812
Irvin Hussein Lopez-NavaData Science and Machine Learning Lab, Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE), Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-3979-9465
Jose Ambrosio-BastianUniversidad Tecnológica de México (UNITEC), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-7326-3440

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes substantial disability by disrupting spinal pathways, making functional independence a central rehabilitation goal. In 2024, approximately 15.4 million people worldwide were living with SCI. Despite its clinical relevance, traditional prognostic tools, notably the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), have limitations. Furthermore, access to advanced diagnostics constrains prediction. Existing models often fail to estimate independence, limiting goal setting and resource planning. Objective: This study aims to develop and validate machine learning (ML)-based rules that predict functional independence, as measured by the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III (SCIM-III), at 3, 6, and 12 months post injury in individuals with SCI. The model combines clinical admission predictors, readily available to enhance predictive performance: age, sex, time since injury, upper and lower extremity strength, ISNCSCI data (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grade and neurologic level of injury), rehabilitation type, and the Trunk Control Scale score validated by the research team. Methods: Using retrospective electronic clinical records (2015-2026) from Mexico's Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra (INR LGII; a tertiary national rehabilitation reference center) for model development and a prospective independent cohort (October 2026-October 2027) for external validation, the study will develop ML models to accurately and generally predict SCIM-III outcomes. Eligible participants are adults (≥18 years of age) with subacute or chronic SCI. Six architectures are compared: linear regression, classification and regression tree, categorical boosting (gradient boosting algorithm), light gradient boosting machine, multilayer perceptron, and Gaussian process regression, using 10-fold stratified cross-validation for internal validation. Performance is assessed by root-mean-square error, mean absolute error, R², area under the curve, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The approach prioritizes reproducibility, interpretability, and clinical applicability, addressing prior models' limitations (small sample sizes, limited validation, and impractical input requirements). Key steps include data preprocessing, feature selection, model training with appropriate algorithms, and robust evaluation against existing prognostic benchmarks. External validation and ethical considerations are integrated, with commitments to data sharing where feasible. Results: The study was approved and funded in October 2025. The retrospective development cohort targets 500 registries (from 2025-2026) collected between October 2025 and June 2026. A total of 119 records were processed by March 2026. ML development is planned between June 2026 and March 2027. The external prospective validation cohort (n=100) is planned for October 2026-October 2027, and validation for June 2027-March 2028. Results are expected by January 2028. Conclusions: A reliable, clinically actionable ML-based prediction tool that estimates SCIM-III trajectories to support goal setting, rehabilitation planning, and resource allocation in SCI care will be developed. Model performance will be benchmarked against published SCI prediction rules, and it will be considered clinically useful if it outperforms the mean-score baseline and existing rules on the prospective validation cohort.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSpinal Cord InjuriesClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisartificial intelligencefunctional independencemachine learningpredictive modelingprognosisrehabilitationSCIM-IIIspinal cord injurytrunk control

Identifiers

PMID42397879
PMCPMC13331064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.