ReviewMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2026
UK consensus on pregnancy in multiple sclerosis: An update to 'Association of British Neurologists' guidance.
Review in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe first Association of British Neurologists (ABN) UK multiple sclerosis (MS) pregnancy guidelines were published in 2019. Along with new disease-modifying treatments, significant new data have since become available, resulting in label changes and recognition of class effects. Alongside this, there has been increasing recognition of the importance of family planning considerations in treatment paradigms in MS.
methodsWe set out to update the ABN UK MS Pregnancy guidance with a systematic literature search, with updated guidance informed by multidisciplinary input from across neurology, obstetric medicine, pharmacy and specialist nurses.Guidance:Key updates include consideration of disease-modifying therapy mechanism and durability of action when discussing treatment approaches around pregnancy, alongside considering the impact of treatment withdrawal on relapses during pregnancy and in the postpartum period. Monoclonal antibody transfer into breast milk is generally accepted to be low, and so treatment during lactation can be considered. Active discussion around vaccination strategies during pregnancy and of the neonate is required, with vaccines generally considered safe. With active treatment strategies that take these factors into account, women can be reassured regarding disease control during pregnancy.
conclusionData sources remain limited, and further dedicated real-world studies that capture the full range of outcomes required to inform risk-benefit discussions are needed. These require collaboration and infrastructure to support the delivery of high-quality care to all women with MS considering pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.